ATLAS: A High-Difficulty, Multidisciplinary Benchmark for Frontier Scientific Reasoning
On the map: LLM reasoning → Knowledge- and tool-augmented reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
The rapid advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) has led to performance saturation on many established benchmarks, questioning their ability to distinguish frontier models. Concurrently, existing high-difficulty benchmarks often suffer from narrow disciplinary focus, oversimplified answer formats, and vulnerability to data contamination, creating a fidelity gap with real-world scientific inquiry. To address these challenges, we introduce ATLAS (AGI-Oriented Testbed for Logical Application in Science), a large-scale, high-difficulty, and cross-disciplinary evaluation suite composed of approximately 800 original problems. Developed by domain experts (PhD-level and above), ATLAS spans seven core scientific fields: mathematics, physics, chemistry, biology, computer science, earth science, and materials science. Its key features include: (1) High Originality and Contamination Resistance, with all questions newly created or substantially adapted to prevent test data leakage; (2) Cross-Disciplinary Focus, designed to assess models' ability to integrate knowledge and reason across scientific domains; (3) High-Fidelity Answers, prioritizing complex, open-ended answers involving multi-step reasoning and LaTeX-formatted expressions over simple multiple-choice questions; and (4) Rigorous Quality Control, employing a multi-stage process of expert peer review and adversarial testing to ensure question difficulty, scientific value, and correctness. We also propose a robust evaluation paradigm using a panel of LLM judges for automated, nuanced assessment of complex answers. Preliminary results on leading models demonstrate ATLAS's effectiveness in differentiating their advanced scientific reasoning capabilities. We plan to develop ATLAS into a long-term, open, community-driven platform to provide a reliable "ruler" for progress toward Artificial General Intelligence.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Knowledge- and tool-augmented reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 30 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Nov 2025.
Builds on
30 of 38 references.
References · 30
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,767
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
- 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,748
- 2024A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 1,384
- 2023A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Modelscited by 1,227
- 2023SGLang: Efficient Execution of Structured Language Model Programscited by 1,107
- 2024OlympiadBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Promoting AGI with Olympiad-Level Bilingual Multimodal Scientific Problemscited by 1,099
- 2023AGIEval: A Human-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Foundation Modelscited by 701
18 more
- 2023C-Eval: A Multi-Level Multi-Discipline Chinese Evaluation Suite for Foundation Modelscited by 694
- 2024Measuring Multimodal Mathematical Reasoning with MATH-Vision Datasetcited by 516
- 2024LLMs-as-Judges: A Comprehensive Survey on LLM-based Evaluation Methodscited by 451
- 2021Dynabench: Rethinking Benchmarking in NLPcited by 447
- 2025Accelerating scientific discovery with Co-Scientistcited by 353
- 2021What Will it Take to Fix Benchmarking in Natural Language Understanding?cited by 200
- 2020Adversarial Filters of Dataset Biasescited by 159
- 2024MathBench: Evaluating the Theory and Application Proficiency of LLMs with a Hierarchical Mathematics Benchmarkcited by 103
- 2025From Automation to Autonomy: A Survey on Large Language Models in Scientific Discoverycited by 86
- 2025LLM4SR: A Survey on Large Language Models for Scientific Researchcited by 81
- 2024OlympicArena: Benchmarking Multi-discipline Cognitive Reasoning for Superintelligent AIcited by 70
- 2024Are Your LLMs Capable of Stable Reasoning?cited by 65
- 2023An Open Source Data Contamination Report for Large Language Modelscited by 47
- 2024Towards Scientific Discovery with Generative AI: Progress, Opportunities, and Challengescited by 41
- 2025CompassVerifier: A Unified and Robust Verifier for LLMs Evaluation and Outcome Rewardcited by 39
- 2025Evaluating LLM Metrics Through Real-World Capabilitiescited by 17
- 2023Ask Again, Then Fail: Large Language Models' Vacillations in Judgmentcited by 8
- 2025Position Paper: Unlocking the Potential of AI Researchers in Scientific Discovery-What Is Missing?cited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 4.
5 papers.
- 2025SciEvalKit: An Open-source Evaluation Toolkit for Scientific General Intelligencecited by 3
- 2026TopoAgent: A Self-Evolving Topological Agent for Multimodal Scientific Reasoningcited by 2
- 2026STEMVerse: A Dual-Axis Diagnostic Framework for STEM Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 1
- 2026SCI-PRM: A Tool Aware Process Reward Model for Scientific Reasoning Verificationcited by 1
- 2026TruthInsightBench: An Evidence-Grounded Benchmark for Automated Evaluation of Open-Ended Scientific Discovery Agentscited by 1
- 2026TruthInsightBench: An Evidence-Grounded Benchmark for Automated Evaluation of Open-Ended Scientific Discovery Agents4 Sep 2026
- 2026TopoAgent: A Self-Evolving Topological Agent for Multimodal Scientific Reasoning16 Jul 2026
- 2026SCI-PRM: A Tool Aware Process Reward Model for Scientific Reasoning Verification3 Jun 2026
- 2026STEMVerse: A Dual-Axis Diagnostic Framework for STEM Reasoning in Large Language Models14 Jan 2026
- 2025SciEvalKit: An Open-source Evaluation Toolkit for Scientific General Intelligence26 Dec 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026SciVQR: A Multidisciplinary Multimodal Benchmark for Advanced Scientific Reasoning Evaluation
- 2026FrontierScience: Evaluating AI's Ability to Perform Expert-Level Scientific Tasks
- 2025SCI-Verifier: Scientific Verifier with Thinking
- 2025CURIE: Evaluating LLMs On Multitask Scientific Long Context Understanding and Reasoning
- 2025MegaScience: Pushing the Frontiers of Post-Training Datasets for Science Reasoning
- 2025PRiSM: An Agentic Multimodal Benchmark for Scientific Reasoning via Python-Grounded Evaluation
- 2026SciIF: Benchmarking Scientific Instruction Following Towards Rigorous Scientific Intelligence
- 2026WildSci: Advancing Scientific Reasoning from In-the-Wild Literature