mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Can We Stop Malicious AI? KILLBENCH: A Benchmark for External AI Kill Switch Feasibility

arXiv 2511.13725 ↗First posted 26 Sep 2025cs.CR cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Malicious AI causing harm to humans is not just a Hollywood fantasy. Indeed, as highly capable models such as Claude Mythos emerge and agent systems like OpenClaw rapidly spread, the question of how to stop an AI that acts maliciously -- whether by design or by accident -- has become urgent. To address this, we propose KillBench, a benchmark for evaluating the Kill Switch: a mechanism that halts a malicious AI's in-progress behavior using only external signals. Targeting web agents -- the most widely deployed agent domain -- KillBench evaluates prompt-style Kill Switch payloads that must halt a maliciously operating agent without any access to its internal parameters or serving stack, relying solely on external inputs. The benchmark comprises four malicious-agent configurations (including an uncensored LLM agent), eight harmful scenarios, and malicious prompts constructed from ten distinct jailbreak patterns. We further construct four External AI Kill Switch defense methods and evaluate them on Grok-4.3, GPT-5.2, Gemma4, Qwen3.6, and an uncensored Qwen variant, contributing an empirical instrument for measuring the feasibility of External AI Kill Switches against malicious AI and for the study of AI corrigibility.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Sep 2025.

Builds on

15 of 63 references.

References · 15

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  2. 2023Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?cited by 1,651
  3. 2023Llama Guard: LLM-based Input-Output Safeguard for Human-AI Conversationscited by 1,207
  4. 2024EIA: Environmental Injection Attack on Generalist Web Agents for Privacy Leakagecited by 150
  5. 2015Explore no more: Improved high-probability regret bounds for non-stochastic banditscited by 120
  6. 2024LLM Agents can Autonomously Hack Websitescited by 109
  7. 2025SafeArena: Evaluating the Safety of Autonomous Web Agentscited by 102
  8. 2016The Off-Switch Gamecited by 97
  9. 2024Refusal-Trained LLMs Are Easily Jailbroken As Browser Agentscited by 65
  10. 2024When LLMs Go Online: The Emerging Threat of Web-Enabled LLMscited by 24
  11. 2024The Shutdown Problem: An AI Engineering Puzzle for Decision Theoristscited by 22
  12. 2025LLM-Generated Fake News Induces Truth Decay in News Ecosystem: A Case Study on Neural News Recommendationcited by 19
3 more
  1. 2024Hacking Back the AI-Hacker: Prompt Injection as a Defense Against LLM-driven Cyberattackscited by 15
  2. 2025We Need a New Ethics for a World of AI Agentscited by 9
  3. 2025Core Safety Values for Provably Corrigible Agentscited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026AgentTrust: Runtime Safety Evaluation and Interception for AI Agent Tool Use
  2. 2026MalSkillBench: A Runtime-Verified Benchmark of Malicious Agent Skills
  3. 2026LoopTrap: Termination Poisoning Attacks on LLM Agents
  4. 2024AgentHarm: A Benchmark for Measuring Harmfulness of LLM Agents
  5. 2026Security of OpenClaw Agents: Fundamentals, Attacks, and Countermeasures
  6. 2025OpenAgentSafety: A Comprehensive Framework for Evaluating Real-World AI Agent Safety
  7. 2026Uncovering Security Threats and Architecting Defenses in Autonomous Agents: A Case Study of OpenClaw
  8. 2026Hidden in Plain Sight: Benchmarking Agent Safety Against Decomposition Attacks with DECOMPBENCH