SynBullying: A Multi LLM Synthetic Conversational Dataset for Cyberbullying Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We introduce SynBullying, a synthetic multi-LLM conversational dataset for studying and detecting cyberbullying (CB). SynBullying provides a scalable and ethically safe alternative to human data collection by leveraging large language models (LLMs) to simulate realistic bullying interactions. The dataset offers (i) conversational structure, capturing multi-turn exchanges rather than isolated posts; (ii) context-aware annotations, where harmfulness is assessed within the conversational flow considering context, intent, and discourse dynamics; and (iii) fine-grained labeling, covering various CB categories for detailed linguistic and behavioral analysis. We evaluate SynBullying across five dimensions, including conversational structure, lexical patterns, sentiment/toxicity, role dynamics, harm intensity, and CB-type distribution. We further examine its utility by testing its performance as standalone training data and as an augmentation source for CB classification.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Oct 2025.
Builds on
14 of 51 references.
References · 14
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2016Ex Machina: Personal Attacks Seen at Scalecited by 208
- 2022Generating Training Data with Language Models: Towards Zero-Shot Language Understandingcited by 199
- 2021GPT3Mix: Leveraging Large-scale Language Models for Text Augmentationcited by 185
- 2019Not Enough Data? Deep Learning to the Rescue!cited by 174
- 2017Mean Birds: Detecting Aggression and Bullying on Twittercited by 29
- 2021Defining and Detecting Toxicity on Social Media: Context and Knowledge are Keycited by 29
- 2018Automatic Detection of Cyberbullying in Social Media Textcited by 25
- 2024ToxiCraft: A Novel Framework for Synthetic Generation of Harmful Informationcited by 17
- 2020Aggressive, Repetitive, Intentional, Visible, and Imbalanced: Refining Representations for Cyberbullying Classificationcited by 7
- 2019Current Limitations in Cyberbullying Detection: on Evaluation Criteria, Reproducibility, and Data Scarcitycited by 6
- 2025Synthetic vs. Gold: The Role of LLM Generated Labels and Data in Cyberbullying Detectioncited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.