mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Synthetic vs. Gold: The Role of LLM Generated Labels and Data in Cyberbullying Detection

arXiv 2502.15860 ↗First posted 21 Feb 2025cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Cyberbullying (CB) presents a pressing threat, especially to children, underscoring the urgent need for robust detection systems to ensure online safety. While large-scale datasets on online abuse exist, there remains a significant gap in labeled data that specifically reflects the language and communication styles used by children. The acquisition of such data from vulnerable populations, such as children, is challenging due to ethical, legal and technical barriers. Moreover, the creation of these datasets relies heavily on human annotation, which not only strains resources but also raises significant concerns due to annotators exposure to harmful content. In this paper, we address these challenges by leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate synthetic data and labels. Our experiments demonstrate that synthetic data enables BERT-based CB classifiers to achieve performance close to that of those trained on fully authentic datasets (75.8% vs. 81.5% accuracy). Additionally, LLMs can effectively label authentic yet unlabeled data, allowing BERT classifiers to attain a comparable performance level (79.1% vs. 81.5% accuracy). These results highlight the potential of LLMs as a scalable, ethical, and cost-effective solution for generating data for CB detection.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Feb 2025.

Builds on

10 of 37 references.

References · 10

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  3. 2019HuggingFace's Transformers: State-of-the-art Natural Language Processingcited by 2,218
  4. 2022Generating Training Data with Language Models: Towards Zero-Shot Language Understandingcited by 199
  5. 2021GPT3Mix: Leveraging Large-scale Language Models for Text Augmentationcited by 187
  6. 2019Not Enough Data? Deep Learning to the Rescue!cited by 175
  7. 2023NoteChat: A Dataset of Synthetic Doctor-Patient Conversations Conditioned on Clinical Notescited by 48
  8. 2021Generate, Annotate, and Learn: NLP with Synthetic Textcited by 42
  9. 2024ToxiCraft: A Novel Framework for Synthetic Generation of Harmful Informationcited by 17
  10. 2024A Multi-faceted Semi-Synthetic Dataset for Automated Cyberbullying Detectioncited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023A Trustable LSTM-Autoencoder Network for Cyberbullying Detection on Social Media Using Synthetic Data
  2. 2024Towards Generalized Offensive Language Identification
  3. 2025Towards Safer Pretraining: Analyzing and Filtering Harmful Content in Webscale datasets for Responsible LLMs
  4. 2025LLM-based Semantic Augmentation for Harmful Content Detection
  5. 2025A survey of textual cyber abuse detection using cutting-edge language models and large language models
  6. 2024Utilizing Large Language Models to Generate Synthetic Data to Increase the Performance of BERT-Based Neural Networks
  7. 2025Something Just Like TRuST : Toxicity Recognition of Span and Target
  8. 2025<think> So let's replace this phrase with insult... </think> Lessons learned from generation of toxic texts with LLMs