mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Robust and Diverse Multi-Agent Learning via Rational Policy Gradient

arXiv 2511.09535 ↗First posted 12 Nov 2025cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Adversarial optimization algorithms that explicitly search for flaws in agents' policies have been successfully applied to finding robust and diverse policies in multi-agent settings. However, the success of adversarial optimization has been largely limited to zero-sum settings because its naive application in cooperative settings leads to a critical failure mode: agents are irrationally incentivized to self-sabotage, blocking the completion of tasks and halting further learning. To address this, we introduce Rationality-preserving Policy Optimization (RPO), a formalism for adversarial optimization that avoids self-sabotage by ensuring agents remain rational--that is, their policies are optimal with respect to some possible partner policy. To solve RPO, we develop Rational Policy Gradient (RPG), which trains agents to maximize their own reward in a modified version of the original game in which we use opponent shaping techniques to optimize the adversarial objective. RPG enables us to extend a variety of existing adversarial optimization algorithms that, no longer subject to the limitations of self-sabotage, can find adversarial examples, improve robustness and adaptability, and learn diverse policies. We empirically validate that our approach achieves strong performance in several popular cooperative and general-sum environments. Our project page can be found at https://rational-policy-gradient.github.io.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Nov 2025.

Builds on

23 of 34 references.

References · 23

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2019On the Utility of Learning about Humans for Human-AI Coordinationcited by 345
  3. 2020Emergent Complexity and Zero-shot Transfer via Unsupervised Environment Designcited by 260
  4. 2017Learning with Opponent-Learning Awarenesscited by 218
  5. 2019Adversarial Policies: Attacking Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 209
  6. 2019The Hanabi Challenge: A New Frontier for AI Researchcited by 194
  7. 2020"Other-Play" for Zero-Shot Coordinationcited by 194
  8. 2018Stable Opponent Shaping in Differentiable Gamescited by 49
  9. 2018DiCE: The Infinitely Differentiable Monte-Carlo Estimatorcited by 46
  10. 2022Model-Free Opponent Shapingcited by 43
  11. 2020A Policy Gradient Algorithm for Learning to Learn in Multiagent Reinforcement Learningcited by 40
  12. 2021A New Formalism, Method and Open Issues for Zero-Shot Coordinationcited by 31
11 more
  1. 2024Learning to Cooperate with Humans using Generative Agentscited by 23
  2. 2025Optimizing ML Training with Metagradient Descentcited by 22
  3. 2022Generating Teammates for Training Robust Ad Hoc Teamwork Agents via Best-Response Diversitycited by 17
  4. 2022Equivariant Networks for Zero-Shot Coordinationcited by 16
  5. 2023Diverse Conventions for Human-AI Collaborationcited by 14
  6. 2019Loaded DiCE: Trading off Bias and Variance in Any-Order Score Function Estimators for Reinforcement Learningcited by 12
  7. 2023Scaling Opponent Shaping to High Dimensional Gamescited by 12
  8. 2025ROTATE: Regret-driven Open-ended Training for Ad Hoc Teamworkcited by 6
  9. 2023Who Needs to Know? Minimal Knowledge for Optimal Coordinationcited by 5
  10. 2025Improving Human-AI Coordination through Online Adversarial Training and Generative Modelscited by 3
  11. 2025Unsupervised Partner Design Enables Robust Ad-hoc Teamworkcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.