mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Multiple testing for signal-agnostic searches of new physics with machine learning

arXiv 2408.12296 ↗First posted 22 Aug 2024hep-ph cs.LG hep-excited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this work, we address the question of how to enhance signal-agnostic searches by leveraging multiple testing strategies. Specifically, we consider hypothesis tests relying on machine learning, where model selection can introduce a bias towards specific families of new physics signals. We show that it is beneficial to combine different tests, characterised by distinct choices of hyperparameters, and that performances comparable to the best available test are generally achieved while providing a more uniform response to various types of anomalies. Focusing on the New Physics Learning Machine, a methodology to perform a signal-agnostic likelihood-ratio test, we explore a number of approaches to multiple testing, such as combining p-values and aggregating test statistics.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Aug 2024.

Builds on

8 of 39 references.

References · 8

  1. 2016Generalization Properties of Learning with Random Featurescited by 163
  2. 2020Kernel methods through the roof: handling billions of points efficientlycited by 88
  3. 2023MMD-FUSE: Learning and Combining Kernels for Two-Sample Testing Without Data Splittingcited by 33
  4. 2023Machine Learning for Anomaly Detection in Particle Physicscited by 29
  5. 2022Learning new physics efficiently with nonparametric methodscited by 20
  6. 2017Choosing Between Methods of Combining p-valuescited by 17
  7. 2023Goodness of fit by Neyman-Pearson testingcited by 10
  8. 2023Fast kernel methods for Data Quality Monitoring as a goodness-of-fit testcited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 3.

7 papers.