Multiple testing for signal-agnostic searches of new physics with machine learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this work, we address the question of how to enhance signal-agnostic searches by leveraging multiple testing strategies. Specifically, we consider hypothesis tests relying on machine learning, where model selection can introduce a bias towards specific families of new physics signals. We show that it is beneficial to combine different tests, characterised by distinct choices of hyperparameters, and that performances comparable to the best available test are generally achieved while providing a more uniform response to various types of anomalies. Focusing on the New Physics Learning Machine, a methodology to perform a signal-agnostic likelihood-ratio test, we explore a number of approaches to multiple testing, such as combining p-values and aggregating test statistics.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Aug 2024.
Builds on
8 of 39 references.
References · 8
- 2016Generalization Properties of Learning with Random Featurescited by 163
- 2020Kernel methods through the roof: handling billions of points efficientlycited by 88
- 2023MMD-FUSE: Learning and Combining Kernels for Two-Sample Testing Without Data Splittingcited by 33
- 2023Machine Learning for Anomaly Detection in Particle Physicscited by 29
- 2022Learning new physics efficiently with nonparametric methodscited by 20
- 2017Choosing Between Methods of Combining p-valuescited by 17
- 2023Goodness of fit by Neyman-Pearson testingcited by 10
- 2023Fast kernel methods for Data Quality Monitoring as a goodness-of-fit testcited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 3.
7 papers.
- 2025Comparing Generative Models with the New Physics Learning Machinecited by 4
- 2025Learning to Validate Generative Models: a Goodness-of-Fit Approachcited by 4
- 2026Model-Agnostic Signal Discovery with Machine Learning: Bridging the Gap Between Theory and Practicecited by 3
- 2025AutoSciDACT: Automated Scientific Discovery through Contrastive Embedding and Hypothesis Testingcited by 2
- 2026Regularized f-Divergence Kernel Testscited by 2
- 2025Sparse, self-organizing ensembles of local kernels detect rare statistical anomaliescited by 1
- 2026Are We Ready for AI-Driven Discovery? AI Verification Before the Next Fundamental Physics Breakthroughcited by 1
- 2026Are We Ready for AI-Driven Discovery? AI Verification Before the Next Fundamental Physics Breakthrough10 Jul 2026
- 2026Model-Agnostic Signal Discovery with Machine Learning: Bridging the Gap Between Theory and Practice29 May 2026
- 2026Regularized f-Divergence Kernel Tests27 Jan 2026
- 2025Learning to Validate Generative Models: a Goodness-of-Fit Approach12 Nov 2025
- 2025Sparse, self-organizing ensembles of local kernels detect rare statistical anomalies5 Nov 2025
- 2025AutoSciDACT: Automated Scientific Discovery through Contrastive Embedding and Hypothesis Testing24 Oct 2025
- 2025Comparing Generative Models with the New Physics Learning Machine4 Aug 2025