Fast kernel methods for Data Quality Monitoring as a goodness-of-fit test
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We here propose a machine learning approach for monitoring particle detectors in real-time. The goal is to assess the compatibility of incoming experimental data with a reference dataset, characterising the data behaviour under normal circumstances, via a likelihood-ratio hypothesis test. The model is based on a modern implementation of kernel methods, nonparametric algorithms that can learn any continuous function given enough data. The resulting approach is efficient and agnostic to the type of anomaly that may be present in the data. Our study demonstrates the effectiveness of this strategy on multivariate data from drift tube chamber muon detectors.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Mar 2023.
Builds on
8 of 32 references.
References · 8
- 2016Revisiting Classifier Two-Sample Testscited by 258
- 2015Less is More: Nystr"om Computational Regularizationcited by 89
- 2020Kernel methods through the roof: handling billions of points efficientlycited by 88
- 2017FALKON: An Optimal Large Scale Kernel Methodcited by 82
- 2019Beyond Least-Squares: Fast Rates for Regularized Empirical Risk Minimization through Self-Concordancecited by 28
- 2022Learning new physics efficiently with nonparametric methodscited by 20
- 2019Globally Convergent Newton Methods for Ill-conditioned Generalized Self-concordant Lossescited by 17
- 2018Detector monitoring with artificial neural networks at the CMS experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collidercited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.
7 papers.
- 2023Goodness of fit by Neyman-Pearson testingcited by 10
- 2024Multiple testing for signal-agnostic searches of new physics with machine learningcited by 7
- 2025Comparing Generative Models with the New Physics Learning Machinecited by 4
- 2025Learning to Validate Generative Models: a Goodness-of-Fit Approachcited by 4
- 2026Model-Agnostic Signal Discovery with Machine Learning: Bridging the Gap Between Theory and Practicecited by 3
- 2025Sparse, self-organizing ensembles of local kernels detect rare statistical anomaliescited by 1
- 2025End-to-End Data Quality-Driven Framework for Machine Learning in Production Environmentcited by 1
- 2026Model-Agnostic Signal Discovery with Machine Learning: Bridging the Gap Between Theory and Practice29 May 2026
- 2025End-to-End Data Quality-Driven Framework for Machine Learning in Production Environment16 Dec 2025
- 2025Learning to Validate Generative Models: a Goodness-of-Fit Approach12 Nov 2025
- 2025Sparse, self-organizing ensembles of local kernels detect rare statistical anomalies5 Nov 2025
- 2025Comparing Generative Models with the New Physics Learning Machine4 Aug 2025
- 2024Multiple testing for signal-agnostic searches of new physics with machine learning22 Aug 2024
- 2023Goodness of fit by Neyman-Pearson testing23 May 2023