PrivacyCD: Hierarchical Unlearning for Protecting Student Privacy in Cognitive Diagnosis
On the map: LLM safety and security → Machine unlearning
Abstract (arXiv)
The need to remove specific student data from cognitive diagnosis (CD) models has become a pressing requirement, driven by users' growing assertion of their "right to be forgotten". However, existing CD models are largely designed without privacy considerations and lack effective data unlearning mechanisms. Directly applying general purpose unlearning algorithms is suboptimal, as they struggle to balance unlearning completeness, model utility, and efficiency when confronted with the unique heterogeneous structure of CD models. To address this, our paper presents the first systematic study of the data unlearning problem for CD models, proposing a novel and efficient algorithm: hierarchical importanceguided forgetting (HIF). Our key insight is that parameter importance in CD models exhibits distinct layer wise characteristics. HIF leverages this via an innovative smoothing mechanism that combines individual and layer, level importance, enabling a more precise distinction of parameters associated with the data to be unlearned. Experiments on three real world datasets show that HIF significantly outperforms baselines on key metrics, offering the first effective solution for CD models to respond to user data removal requests and for deploying high-performance, privacy preserving AI systems
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Machine unlearning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 11 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Nov 2025.
Builds on
11 of 25 references.
Closest ancestors · 3
Same direction, newest first
- 2024Distribution-Level Feature Distancing for Machine Unlearning: Towards a Better Trade-off Between Model Utility and Forgetting23 Sep
- 2023Fast Machine Unlearning Without Retraining Through Selective Synaptic Dampening15 Aug
- 2021Machine Unlearning of Features and Labels26 Aug
Other references · 8
- 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,281
- 2019Certified Data Removal from Machine Learning Modelscited by 535
- 2020Amnesiac Machine Learningcited by 319
- 2020Forgetting Outside the Box: Scrubbing Deep Networks of Information Accessible from Input-Output Observationscited by 180
- 2022The Right to be Forgotten in Federated Learning: An Efficient Realization with Rapid Retrainingcited by 118
- 2019Neural Cognitive Diagnosis for Intelligent Education Systemscited by 75
- 2023Improving Normalization with the James-Stein Estimatorcited by 6
- 2024DisenGCD: A Meta Multigraph-assisted Disentangled Graph Learning Framework for Cognitive Diagnosiscited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Shadow Unlearning: A Neuro-Semantic Approach to Fidelity-Preserving Faceless Forgetting in LLMs
- 2026UnPII: Unlearning Personally Identifiable Information with Quantifiable Exposure Risk
- 2025Towards Benchmarking Privacy Vulnerabilities in Selective Forgetting with Large Language Models
- 2025Efficient Unlearning with Privacy Guarantees
- 2024Machine unlearning through fine-grained model parameters perturbation
- 2025Rectifying Privacy and Efficacy Measurements in Machine Unlearning: A New Inference Attack Perspective
- 2025Recalling The Forgotten Class Memberships: Unlearned Models Can Be Noisy Labelers to Leak Privacy
- 2026PrivUn: Unveiling Latent Ripple Effects and Shallow Forgetting in Privacy Unlearning