mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ALAS: Transactional and Dynamic Multi-Agent LLM Planning

arXiv 2511.03094 ↗First posted 5 Nov 2025cs.MAcited by 3

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models enable flexible multi-agent planning but remain fragile in practice: verification is often circular, state changes are not tracked for repair, and small faults trigger costly global recomputation. We present ALAS, a stateful, disruption-aware framework that separates planning from non-circular validation, records a versioned execution log for grounded checks and restore points, and performs localized repair that preserves work in progress. The validator operates independently of the planning LLM with fresh, bounded context, avoiding self-check loops and mid-context attrition. The repair protocol edits only the minimal affected region under explicit policies (retry, catch, timeout, backoff, idempotency keys, compensation, loop guards) defined in a canonical workflow IR that maps to Amazon States Language and Argo Workflows. On job-shop scheduling suites (DMU, TA) across five classical benchmarks, ALAS matches or exceeds strong single-LLM and multi-agent baselines, achieving 83.7% success, reducing token usage by 60%, and running 1.82times faster under comparable settings. A minimal reliability study shows that the validator detects injected structural faults with low overhead, and that localized repair contains runtime perturbations with a bounded edit radius and less makespan degradation than global recompute. Results indicate that the combination of validator isolation, versioned execution logs, and localized repair provides measurable efficiency, feasibility, and scalability for multi-agent LLM planning. Code and seeds will be released.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 29 of its 74 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Nov 2025.

Builds on

29 of 74 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024AFlow: Automating Agentic Workflow Generation14 Oct

Other references · 28

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  3. 2023Efficient Streaming Language Models with Attention Sinkscited by 2,115
  4. 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,970
  5. 2023MetaGPT: Meta Programming for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Frameworkcited by 1,761
  6. 2023CAMEL: Communicative Agents for "Mind" Exploration of Large Language Model Societycited by 1,348
  7. 2024DeepSeek-V3 Technical Reportcited by 724
  8. 2024Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 506
  9. 2024Understanding the planning of LLM agents: A surveycited by 414
  10. 2023Larger language models do in-context learning differentlycited by 386
  11. 2023Llemma: An Open Language Model For Mathematicscited by 385
  12. 2025Large Language Model Agent: A Survey on Methodology, Applications and Challengescited by 194
16 more
  1. 2023Navigate through Enigmatic Labyrinth A Survey of Chain of Thought Reasoning: Advances, Frontiers and Futurecited by 184
  2. 2022Text and Patterns: For Effective Chain of Thought, It Takes Two to Tangocited by 128
  3. 2024Large Language Models Can Learn Temporal Reasoningcited by 110
  4. 2024Found in the Middle: Calibrating Positional Attention Bias Improves Long Context Utilizationcited by 97
  5. 2023Context-faithful Prompting for Large Language Modelscited by 76
  6. 2025SagaLLM: Context Management, Validation, and Transaction Guarantees for Multi-Agent LLM Planningcited by 58
  7. 2023A Closer Look at the Self-Verification Abilities of Large Language Models in Logical Reasoningcited by 41
  8. 2025A Survey on Large Language Models with some Insights on their Capabilities and Limitationscited by 41
  9. 2023TimeBench: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Temporal Reasoning Abilities in Large Language Modelscited by 39
  10. 2024Multi-LogiEval: Towards Evaluating Multi-Step Logical Reasoning Ability of Large Language Modelscited by 38
  11. 2024ACPBench: Reasoning about Action, Change, and Planningcited by 37
  12. 2023Dissecting Chain-of-Thought: Compositionality through In-Context Filtering and Learningcited by 19
  13. 2025REALM-Bench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Multi-Agent Systems on Real-world, Dynamic Planning and Scheduling Taskscited by 16
  14. 2025Starjob: Dataset for LLM-Driven Job Shop Schedulingcited by 12
  15. 2024LLMs can Schedulecited by 11
  16. 2023PlaSma: Making Small Language Models Better Procedural Knowledge Models for (Counterfactual) Planningcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025ALAS: A Stateful Multi-LLM Agent Framework for Disruption-Aware Planning
  2. 2026Maat: Independent Deterministic Contract-Based Governance for Multi-Agent LLM Workflows
  3. 2026Verified Tool Calls Improve LLM Agent Reliability Under Non-Atomic Failures
  4. 2026Mnemosyne: Agentic Transaction Processing for Validating and Repairing AI-generated Workflows
  5. 2026From Agent Loops to Structured Graphs:A Scheduler-Theoretic Framework for LLM Agent Execution
  6. 2026Fresh Memory, Stale Plans: Dependency-Scoped Validation for Distributed LLM-Agent Memory
  7. 2026Toward Safe LLM Agents: A Survey of Specification, Verification, and Enforcement
  8. 2026AgentRewind: Recoverable Execution for Long-Horizon LLM Agents