Power Constrained Nonstationary Bandits with Habituation and Recovery Dynamics
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A common challenge for decision makers is selecting actions whose rewards are unknown and evolve over time based on prior policies. For instance, repeated use may reduce an action's effectiveness (habituation), while inactivity may restore it (recovery). These nonstationarities are captured by the Reducing or Gaining Unknown Efficacy (ROGUE) bandit framework, which models real-world settings such as behavioral health interventions. While existing algorithms can compute sublinear regret policies to optimize these settings, they may not provide sufficient exploration due to overemphasis on exploitation, limiting the ability to estimate population-level effects. This is a challenge of particular interest in micro-randomized trials (MRTs) that aid researchers in developing just-in-time adaptive interventions that have population-level effects while still providing personalized recommendations to individuals. In this paper, we first develop ROGUE-TS, a Thompson Sampling algorithm tailored to the ROGUE framework, and provide theoretical guarantees of sublinear regret. We then introduce a probability clipping procedure to balance personalization and population-level learning, with quantified trade-off that balances regret and minimum exploration probability. Validation on two MRT datasets concerning physical activity promotion and bipolar disorder treatment shows that our methods both achieve lower regret than existing approaches and maintain high statistical power through the clipping procedure without significantly increasing regret. This enables reliable detection of treatment effects while accounting for individual behavioral dynamics. For researchers designing MRTs, our framework offers practical guidance on balancing personalization with statistical validity.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Nov 2025.
Builds on
15 of 67 references.
References · 15
- 2013Learning to Optimize Via Posterior Samplingcited by 256
- 2016Fairness in Learning: Classic and Contextual Banditscited by 168
- 2015Multi-armed Bandit Models for the Optimal Design of Clinical Trials: Benefits and Challengescited by 114
- 2016Causal Bandits: Learning Good Interventions via Causal Inferencecited by 101
- 2017Efficient Contextual Bandits in Non-stationary Worldscited by 62
- 2020Power Constrained Banditscited by 30
- 2016Assessing Time-Varying Causal Effect Moderation in Mobile Healthcited by 27
- 2017Non-Stationary Bandits with Habituation and Recovery Dynamicscited by 23
- 2022Non-Stationary Bandit Learning via Predictive Samplingcited by 21
- 2021The Micro-Randomized Trial for Developing Digital Interventions: Experimental Design and Data Analysis Considerationscited by 11
- 2023Policy Optimization for Personalized Interventions in Behavioral Healthcited by 9
- 2023Model Based Reinforcement Learning for Personalized Heparin Dosingcited by 5
3 more
- 2023Planning a Community Approach to Diabetes Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries Using Optimizationcited by 3
- 2024Non-stationary Bandits with Habituation and Recovery Dynamics and Knapsack Constraintscited by 3
- 2025An Adaptive Control Approach to Treatment Selection for Substance Use Disorderscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.