Pragmatic Theories Enhance Understanding of Implied Meanings in LLMs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The ability to accurately interpret implied meanings plays a crucial role in human communication and language use, and language models are also expected to possess this capability. This study demonstrates that providing language models with pragmatic theories as prompts is an effective in-context learning approach for tasks to understand implied meanings. Specifically, we propose an approach in which an overview of pragmatic theories, such as Gricean pragmatics and Relevance Theory, is presented as a prompt to the language model, guiding it through a step-by-step reasoning process to derive a final interpretation. Experimental results showed that, compared to the baseline, which prompts intermediate reasoning without presenting pragmatic theories (0-shot Chain-of-Thought), our methods enabled language models to achieve up to 9.6% higher scores on pragmatic reasoning tasks. Furthermore, we show that even without explaining the details of pragmatic theories, merely mentioning their names in the prompt leads to a certain performance improvement (around 1-3%) in larger models compared to the baseline.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Oct 2025.
Builds on
17 of 50 references.
References · 17
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,767
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
- 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,718
- 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,323
- 2018Generating Wikipedia by Summarizing Long Sequencescited by 333
- 2024The Prompt Report: A Systematic Survey of Prompt Engineering Techniquescited by 115
- 2024Revisiting Catastrophic Forgetting in Large Language Model Tuningcited by 93
- 2020Are Natural Language Inference Models IMPPRESsive? Learning IMPlicature and PRESuppositioncited by 76
- 2024PUB: A Pragmatics Understanding Benchmark for Assessing LLMs' Pragmatics Capabilitiescited by 58
5 more
- 2022The Goldilocks of Pragmatic Understanding: Fine-Tuning Strategy Matters for Implicature Resolution by LLMscited by 57
- 2025Pragmatics in the Era of Large Language Models: A Survey on Datasets, Evaluation, Opportunities and Challengescited by 31
- 2024Do Large Language Models Understand Conversational Implicature -- A case study with a chinese sitcomcited by 15
- 2023DiPlomat: A Dialogue Dataset for Situated Pragmatic Reasoningcited by 14
- 2023"Is the Pope Catholic?" Applying Chain-of-Thought Reasoning to Understanding Conversational Implicaturescited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Understand the Implication: Learning to Think for Pragmatic Understanding
- 2025On the Same Wavelength? Evaluating Pragmatic Reasoning in Language Models across Broad Concepts
- 2026Evaluating Pragmatic Reasoning in Large Language Models: Evidence from Scalar Diversity
- 2026Computational models of pragmatic reasoning with flexible generation of meaning and expression alternatives
- 2025The Pragmatic Mind of Machines: Tracing the Emergence of Pragmatic Competence in Large Language Models
- 2026CEI: A Benchmark for Evaluating Pragmatic Reasoning in Language Models
- 2024Towards an Analysis of Discourse and Interactional Pragmatic Reasoning Capabilities of Large Language Models
- 2026Presupposition and Reasoning in Conditionals: A Theory-Based Study of Humans and LLMs