mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

DiPlomat: A Dialogue Dataset for Situated Pragmatic Reasoning

arXiv 2306.09030 ↗First posted 15 Jun 2023cs.CLcited by 14

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation

Abstract (arXiv)

Pragmatic reasoning plays a pivotal role in deciphering implicit meanings that frequently arise in real-life conversations and is essential for the development of communicative social agents. In this paper, we introduce a novel challenge, DiPlomat, aiming at benchmarking machines' capabilities on pragmatic reasoning and situated conversational understanding. Compared with previous works that treat different figurative expressions (e.g. metaphor, sarcasm) as individual tasks, DiPlomat provides a cohesive framework towards general pragmatic understanding. Our dataset is created through the utilization of Amazon Mechanical Turk ( AMT ), resulting in a total of 4, 177 multi-turn dialogues. In conjunction with the dataset, we propose two tasks, Pragmatic Identification and Reasoning (PIR) and Conversational Question Answering (CQA). Experimental results with state-of-the-art (SOTA) neural architectures reveal several significant findings: 1) large language models ( LLMs) exhibit poor performance in tackling this subjective domain; 2) comprehensive comprehension of context emerges as a critical factor for establishing benign human-machine interactions; 3) current models defect in the application of pragmatic reasoning. As a result, we call on more attention to improve the ability of context understanding, reasoning, and implied meaning modeling.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 4 of its 69 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jun 2023.

Builds on

4 of 69 references.

References · 4

  1. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  2. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
  3. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
  4. 2022Improving alignment of dialogue agents via targeted human judgementscited by 527

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 5; 2026: 5.

14 papers.

Sort:

By area:

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Reasoning in Conversation: Solving Subjective Tasks through Dialogue Simulation for Large Language Models
  2. 2023Commonsense Reasoning for Conversational AI: A Survey of the State of the Art
  3. 2025On the Same Wavelength? Evaluating Pragmatic Reasoning in Language Models across Broad Concepts
  4. 2025The Pragmatic Mind of Machines: Tracing the Emergence of Pragmatic Competence in Large Language Models
  5. 2025SI-Bench: Benchmarking Social Intelligence of Large Language Models in Human-to-Human Conversations
  6. 2023Dialogue Agents 101: A Beginner's Guide to Critical Ingredients for Designing Effective Conversational Systems
  7. 2022JARVIS: A Neuro-Symbolic Commonsense Reasoning Framework for Conversational Embodied Agents
  8. 2026Which one is banana man? Evaluating vision-language models in multi-turn pragmatic interpretation