mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Understand the Implication: Learning to Think for Pragmatic Understanding

arXiv 2506.13559 ↗First posted 16 Jun 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 3

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation

Abstract (arXiv)

Pragmatics, the ability to infer meaning beyond literal interpretation, is crucial for social cognition and communication. While LLMs have been benchmarked for their pragmatic understanding, improving their performance remains underexplored. Existing methods rely on annotated labels but overlook the reasoning process humans naturally use to interpret implicit meaning. To bridge this gap, we introduce a novel pragmatic dataset, ImpliedMeaningPreference, that includes explicit reasoning (thoughts) for both correct and incorrect interpretations. Through preference-tuning and supervised fine-tuning, we demonstrate that thought-based learning significantly enhances LLMs' pragmatic understanding, improving accuracy by 11.12% across model families. We further discuss a transfer-learning study where we evaluate the performance of thought-based training for the other tasks of pragmatics (presupposition, deixis) that are not seen during the training time and observe an improvement of 16.10% compared to label-trained models.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 17 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jun 2025.

Builds on

17 of 32 references.

References · 17

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  3. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  4. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  5. 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,942
  6. 2024Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Sizecited by 1,998
  7. 2016An overview of gradient descent optimization algorithmscited by 1,033
  8. 2023Gemini: A Family of Highly Capable Multimodal Modelscited by 872
  9. 2022Improving alignment of dialogue agents via targeted human judgementscited by 531
  10. 2024Smaug: Fixing Failure Modes of Preference Optimisation with DPO-Positivecited by 241
  11. 2023System 2 Attention (is something you might need too)cited by 89
  12. 2024Towards Analyzing and Understanding the Limitations of DPO: A Theoretical Perspectivecited by 69
5 more
  1. 2024PUB: A Pragmatics Understanding Benchmark for Assessing LLMs' Pragmatics Capabilitiescited by 59
  2. 2020"I'd rather just go to bed": Understanding Indirect Answerscited by 36
  3. 2023Large Language Models: The Need for Nuance in Current Debates and a Pragmatic Perspective on Understandingcited by 20
  4. 2019Harnessing the linguistic signal to predict scalar inferencescited by 17
  5. 2015SQUINKY! A Corpus of Sentence-level Formality, Informativeness, and Implicaturecited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Pragmatic Theories Enhance Understanding of Implied Meanings in LLMs
  2. 2025The Pragmatic Mind of Machines: Tracing the Emergence of Pragmatic Competence in Large Language Models
  3. 2026CEI: A Benchmark for Evaluating Pragmatic Reasoning in Language Models
  4. 2026Presupposition and Reasoning in Conditionals: A Theory-Based Study of Humans and LLMs
  5. 2026PragReST: Self-Reinforcing Counterfactual Reasoning for Pragmatic Language Understanding
  6. 2026Computational models of pragmatic reasoning with flexible generation of meaning and expression alternatives
  7. 2025On the Same Wavelength? Evaluating Pragmatic Reasoning in Language Models across Broad Concepts
  8. 2026Evaluating Pragmatic Reasoning in Large Language Models: Evidence from Scalar Diversity