mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Estimating cognitive biases with attention-aware inverse planning

arXiv 2510.25951 ↗First posted 29 Oct 2025cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

People's goal-directed behaviors are influenced by their cognitive biases, and autonomous systems that interact with people should be aware of this. For example, people's attention to objects in their environment will be biased in a way that systematically affects how they perform everyday tasks such as driving to work. Here, building on recent work in computational cognitive science, we formally articulate the attention-aware inverse planning problem, in which the goal is to estimate a person's attentional biases from their actions. We demonstrate how attention-aware inverse planning systematically differs from standard inverse reinforcement learning and how cognitive biases can be inferred from behavior. Finally, we present an approach to attention-aware inverse planning that combines deep reinforcement learning with computational cognitive modeling. We use this approach to infer the attentional strategies of RL agents in real-life driving scenarios selected from the Waymo Open Dataset, demonstrating the scalability of estimating cognitive biases with attention-aware inverse planning.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Oct 2025.

Builds on

21 of 56 references.

References · 21

  1. 2017Mastering Chess and Shogi by Self-Play with a General Reinforcement Learning Algorithmcited by 723
  2. 2021Large Scale Interactive Motion Forecasting for Autonomous Driving : The Waymo Open Motion Datasetcited by 532
  3. 2019On the Utility of Learning about Humans for Human-AI Coordinationcited by 345
  4. 2016Cooperative Inverse Reinforcement Learningcited by 298
  5. 2018A Survey of Inverse Reinforcement Learning: Challenges, Methods and Progresscited by 294
  6. 2018Human-level performance in first-person multiplayer games with population-based deep reinforcement learningcited by 260
  7. 2019Human Motion Trajectory Prediction: A Surveycited by 231
  8. 2024Building Machines that Learn and Think with Peoplecited by 73
  9. 2020Predicting Goal-directed Human Attention Using Inverse Reinforcement Learningcited by 53
  10. 2021People construct simplified mental representations to plancited by 45
  11. 2024GPUDrive: Data-driven, multi-agent driving simulation at 1 million FPScited by 43
  12. 2021Cognitive science as a source of forward and inverse models of human decisions for robotics and controlcited by 22
9 more
  1. 2025Building reliable sim driving agents by scaling self-playcited by 20
  2. 2021MAAD: A Model and Dataset for "Attended Awareness" in Drivingcited by 9
  3. 2022Leveraging Smooth Attention Prior for Multi-Agent Trajectory Predictioncited by 9
  4. 2025Naturalistic Computational Cognitive Science: Towards generalizable models and theories that capture the full range of natural behaviorcited by 8
  5. 2023Concept Alignment as a Prerequisite for Value Alignmentcited by 5
  6. 2025Few-shot Personalized Scanpath Predictioncited by 5
  7. 2020Customized Handling of Unintended Interface Operation in Assistive Robotscited by 3
  8. 2025How attention simplifies mental representations for planningcited by 2
  9. 2024Optimal Driver Warning Generation in Dynamic Driving Environmentcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2019On the Feasibility of Learning, Rather than Assuming, Human Biases for Reward Inference
  2. 2026Reward-Conditioned Attention: How Reward Design Shapes What Autonomous Driving Agents See
  3. 2019MEDIRL: Predicting the Visual Attention of Drivers via Maximum Entropy Deep Inverse Reinforcement Learning
  4. 2022Conditional Predictive Behavior Planning with Inverse Reinforcement Learning for Human-like Autonomous Driving
  5. 2021Learning Human Rewards by Inferring Their Latent Intelligence Levels in Multi-Agent Games: A Theory-of-Mind Approach with Application to Driving Data
  6. 2025Foresight in Motion: Reinforcing Trajectory Prediction with Reward Heuristics
  7. 2026Game-Theoretic Inverse Reinforcement Learning for Modeling Competitive Human Driving: A Cut-in Prediction Study
  8. 2023Human-Like Implicit Intention Expression for Autonomous Driving Motion Planning: A Method Based on Learning Human Intention Priors