ISA-Bench: Benchmarking Instruction Sensitivity for Large Audio Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Audio Language Models (LALMs), which couple acoustic perception with large language models (LLMs) to extract and understand diverse information from audio, have attracted intense interest from both academic and industrial communities. However, existing LALMs are highly sensitive to how instructions are phrased, affecting both (i) instruction-following rates and (ii) task performance. Yet, no existing benchmarks offer a systematic and comprehensive evaluation of this sensitivity. We introduce ISA-Bench, a dynamic benchmark evaluating instruction sensitivity for LALMs along three axes: instruction description, output format, and task composition. We assess recent open-source and proprietary LALMs using ISA-Bench, profiling both compliance and accuracy under controlled instruction variations. Experimental results reveal that even state-of-the-art LALMs suffer significant instruction sensitivity, leading to degraded performance on fundamental audio understanding tasks. To mitigate this issue, we fine-tune Qwen2-Audio on a specifically constructed complex instruction-variant dataset, achieving a marked improvement in instruction-following performance. However, this also induces nontrivial catastrophic forgetting: the model loses some previously mastered task capabilities when exposed to new instruction styles. Our benchmark provides a standardized basis for assessing and improving instruction sensitivity in LALMs, underscoring the need for instruction-robust audio understanding in real-world pipelines.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Oct 2025.
Builds on
23 of 30 references.
References · 23
- 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,467
- 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,655
- 2023Instruction-Following Evaluation for Large Language Modelscited by 1,143
- 2023Quantifying Language Models' Sensitivity to Spurious Features in Prompt Design or: How I learned to start worrying about prompt formattingcited by 778
- 2025Qwen2.5-Omni Technical Reportcited by 704
- 2024Qwen2-Audio Technical Reportcited by 543
- 2023SALMONN: Towards Generic Hearing Abilities for Large Language Modelscited by 492
- 2025Phi-4-Mini Technical Report: Compact yet Powerful Multimodal Language Models via Mixture-of-LoRAscited by 491
- 2025Kimi-Audio Technical Reportcited by 210
- 2024Benchmarking Complex Instruction-Following with Multiple Constraints Compositioncited by 147
- 2024ProSA: Assessing and Understanding the Prompt Sensitivity of LLMscited by 145
- 2024InFoBench: Evaluating Instruction Following Ability in Large Language Modelscited by 128
11 more
- 2024WavLLM: Towards Robust and Adaptive Speech Large Language Modelcited by 107
- 2024Self-play with Execution Feedback: Improving Instruction-following Capabilities of Large Language Modelscited by 73
- 2024A Survey on Speech Large Language Models for Understandingcited by 71
- 2025DeSTA2.5-Audio: Toward General-Purpose Large Audio Language Model with Self-Generated Cross-Modal Alignmentcited by 47
- 2024On the Worst Prompt Performance of Large Language Modelscited by 36
- 2024DeSTA: Enhancing Speech Language Models through Descriptive Speech-Text Alignmentcited by 32
- 2025Speech-IFEval: Evaluating Instruction-Following and Quantifying Catastrophic Forgetting in Speech-Aware Language Modelscited by 27
- 2025UltraIF: Advancing Instruction Following from the Wildcited by 18
- 2025CMI-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Music Instruction Followingcited by 15
- 2025IFEval-Audio: Benchmarking Instruction-Following Capability in Audio-based Large Language Modelscited by 4
- 2025AHAMask: Reliable Task Specification for Large Audio Language Models without Instructionscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
- 2026SEE: Signal Embedding Energy for Quantifying Noise Interference in Large Audio Language Modelscited by 3
- 2026When Demonstrations Fail: Diagnosing the Limits of In-Context Learning in Large Audio-Language Models with Progressive Cue Removalcited by 0
- 2026EchoDistill: Robust Large Audio Language Models via Noisy-to-Clean Self-Distillationcited by 0
- 2026EchoDistill: Robust Large Audio Language Models via Noisy-to-Clean Self-Distillation11 May 2026
- 2026When Demonstrations Fail: Diagnosing the Limits of In-Context Learning in Large Audio-Language Models with Progressive Cue Removal20 Mar 2026
- 2026SEE: Signal Embedding Energy for Quantifying Noise Interference in Large Audio Language Models12 Jan 2026