mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

IPQA: A Benchmark for Core Intent Identification in Personalized Question Answering

arXiv 2510.23536 ↗First posted 27 Oct 2025cs.CLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Intent identification serves as the foundation for generating appropriate responses in personalized question answering (PQA). However, existing benchmarks evaluate only response quality or retrieval performance without directly measuring intent identification capabilities. This gap is critical because without understanding which intents users prioritize, systems cannot generate responses satisfying individual information needs. To address this, we introduce the concept of core intents: intents users prioritize when selecting answers to satisfy their information needs. To evaluate these core intents, we propose IPQA, a benchmark for core Intent identification in Personalized Question Answering. Since users do not explicitly state their prioritized intents, we derive core intents from observable behavior patterns in answer selection, grounded in satisficing theory where users choose answers meeting their acceptance thresholds. We construct a dataset with various domains through systematic filtering, LLM-based annotation, and rigorous quality control combining automated verification with human validation. Experimental evaluations across state-of-the-art language models reveal that current systems struggle with core intent identification in personalized contexts. Models fail to identify core intents from user histories, with performance degrading as question complexity increases. The code and dataset will be made publicly available to facilitate future research in this direction.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Oct 2025.

Builds on

25 of 42 references.

References · 25

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  2. 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,767
  3. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
  4. 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,205
  5. 2018A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scorescited by 1,790
  6. 2025Gemma 3 Technical Reportcited by 1,686
  7. 2025Qwen3 Embedding: Advancing Text Embedding and Reranking Through Foundation Modelscited by 1,175
  8. 2024Qwen2.5-Coder Technical Reportcited by 1,151
  9. 2023LaMP: When Large Language Models Meet Personalizationcited by 425
  10. 2020Efficient Intent Detection with Dual Sentence Encoderscited by 419
  11. 2019An Evaluation Dataset for Intent Classification and Out-of-Scope Predictioncited by 378
  12. 2018Snips Voice Platform: an embedded Spoken Language Understanding system for private-by-design voice interfacescited by 376
13 more
  1. 2024LongLaMP: A Benchmark for Personalized Long-form Text Generationcited by 91
  2. 2020Deep Open Intent Classification with Adaptive Decision Boundarycited by 56
  3. 2023Analyzing Dataset Annotation Quality Management in the Wildcited by 39
  4. 2025LaMP-QA: A Benchmark for Personalized Long-form Question Answeringcited by 30
  5. 2025ExPerT: Effective and Explainable Evaluation of Personalized Long-Form Text Generationcited by 26
  6. 2021TEXTOIR: An Integrated and Visualized Platform for Text Open Intent Recognitioncited by 24
  7. 2024Review-driven Personalized Preference Reasoning with Large Language Models for Recommendationcited by 20
  8. 2022Learning Discriminative Representations and Decision Boundaries for Open Intent Detectioncited by 15
  9. 2025UQABench: Evaluating User Embedding for Prompting LLMs in Personalized Question Answeringcited by 9
  10. 2023SE-PQA: Personalized Community Question Answeringcited by 7
  11. 2025MT-RAIG: Novel Benchmark and Evaluation Framework for Retrieval-Augmented Insight Generation over Multiple Tablescited by 7
  12. 2024BlendX: Complex Multi-Intent Detection with Blended Patternscited by 4
  13. 2025Can Large Language Models be Effective Online Opinion Miners?cited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.