AutoSciDACT: Automated Scientific Discovery through Contrastive Embedding and Hypothesis Testing
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Novelty detection in large scientific datasets faces two key challenges: the noisy and high-dimensional nature of experimental data, and the necessity of making statistically robust statements about any observed outliers. While there is a wealth of literature on anomaly detection via dimensionality reduction, most methods do not produce outputs compatible with quantifiable claims of scientific discovery. In this work we directly address these challenges, presenting the first step towards a unified pipeline for novelty detection adapted for the rigorous statistical demands of science. We introduce AutoSciDACT (Automated Scientific Discovery with Anomalous Contrastive Testing), a general-purpose pipeline for detecting novelty in scientific data. AutoSciDACT begins by creating expressive low-dimensional data representations using a contrastive pre-training, leveraging the abundance of high-quality simulated data in many scientific domains alongside expertise that can guide principled data augmentation strategies. These compact embeddings then enable an extremely sensitive machine learning-based two-sample test using the New Physics Learning Machine (NPLM) framework, which identifies and statistically quantifies deviations in observed data relative to a reference distribution (null hypothesis). We perform experiments across a range of astronomical, physical, biological, image, and synthetic datasets, demonstrating strong sensitivity to small injections of anomalous data across all domains.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 46 of its 105 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Oct 2025.
Builds on
46 of 105 references.
References · 46
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 20,851
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
- 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,482
- 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
- 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,803
- 2021Barlow Twins: Self-Supervised Learning via Redundancy Reductioncited by 1,818
- 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,507
- 2018A Simple Unified Framework for Detecting Out-of-Distribution Samples and Adversarial Attackscited by 1,472
- 2021VICReg: Variance-Invariance-Covariance Regularization for Self-Supervised Learningcited by 1,013
34 more
- 2024The AI Scientist: Towards Fully Automated Open-Ended Scientific Discoverycited by 1,002
- 2019Big Transfer (BiT): General Visual Representation Learningcited by 766
- 2018Do Deep Generative Models Know What They Don't Know?cited by 443
- 2020CSI: Novelty Detection via Contrastive Learning on Distributionally Shifted Instancescited by 441
- 2025The AI Scientist-v2: Workshop-Level Automated Scientific Discovery via Agentic Tree Searchcited by 375
- 2025Accelerating scientific discovery with Co-Scientistcited by 353
- 2020Supervised Contrastive Learning for Pre-trained Language Model Fine-tuningcited by 275
- 2018Deep Anomaly Detection Using Geometric Transformationscited by 269
- 2021SSD: A Unified Framework for Self-Supervised Outlier Detectioncited by 264
- 2016Revisiting Classifier Two-Sample Testscited by 258
- 2023BioCLIP: A Vision Foundation Model for the Tree of Lifecited by 159
- 2020Learning Deep Kernels for Non-Parametric Two-Sample Testscited by 129
- 2022Particle Transformer for Jet Taggingcited by 95
- 2020Kernel methods through the roof: handling billions of points efficientlycited by 88
- 2021MMD Aggregated Two-Sample Testcited by 74
- 2017Classification without labels: Learning from mixed samples in high energy physicscited by 42
- 2018Variational Autoencoders for New Physics Mining at the Large Hadron Collidercited by 40
- 2021Mine Your Own vieW: Self-Supervised Learning Through Across-Sample Predictioncited by 36
- 2023MMD-FUSE: Learning and Combining Kernels for Two-Sample Testing Without Data Splittingcited by 33
- 2021Autoencoders for unsupervised anomaly detection in high energy physicscited by 32
- 2023Machine Learning for Anomaly Detection in Particle Physicscited by 29
- 2020Hybrid Discriminative-Generative Training via Contrastive Learningcited by 24
- 2024Re-Simulation-based Self-Supervised Learning for Pre-Training Foundation Modelscited by 21
- 2022Learning new physics efficiently with nonparametric methodscited by 20
- 2020Adversarially Learned Anomaly Detection on CMS Open Data: re-discovering the top quarkcited by 18
- 2022RODD: A Self-Supervised Approach for Robust Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 13
- 2022CADet: Fully Self-Supervised Out-Of-Distribution Detection With Contrastive Learningcited by 11
- 2022Learning image representations for anomaly detection: application to discovery of histological alterations in drug developmentcited by 11
- 2021Contrastive Predictive Coding for Anomaly Detectioncited by 10
- 2023Goodness of fit by Neyman-Pearson testingcited by 10
- 2021Source-Agnostic Gravitational-Wave Detection with Recurrent Autoencoderscited by 7
- 2024Multiple testing for signal-agnostic searches of new physics with machine learningcited by 7
- 2024Real-time Anomaly Detection at the L1 Trigger of CMS Experimentcited by 6
- 2024A Neural Network-Based Search for Unmodeled Transients in LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA's Third Observing Runcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.