String Seed of Thought: Prompting LLMs for Distribution-Faithful and Diverse Generation
On the map: LLM reasoning → Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
We introduce String Seed of Thought (SSoT), a novel prompting method for LLMs that improves Probabilistic Instruction Following (PIF). We define PIF as a task requiring an LLM to select its answer from a predefined set of options, each associated with a specific probability, such that the empirical distribution of the generated answers aligns with the target distribution when prompted multiple times. While LLMs excel at tasks with single, deterministic answers, they often fail at PIF, exhibiting biases problematic for applications requiring non-deterministic behaviors, such as human-behavior simulation, content diversification, and multiplayer games. It also harms the diversity of generated responses, a crucial factor in test-time scaling, by causing the outputs to collapse into a limited set of answers. To address this, we propose SSoT, a simple prompting method that instructs an LLM to first output a random string to generate sufficient entropy. SSoT also instructs the LLM to extract randomness by manipulating this string to derive a final answer, thereby preserving diversity while adhering to specific constraints. We demonstrate that SSoT significantly improves the PIF performance of LLMs, approaching the ideal performance of a pseudo-random number generator. Furthermore, our experiments on NoveltyBench show SSoT's benefits extend beyond closed-set tasks to open-ended tasks by enhancing response diversity.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 12 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Oct 2025.
Builds on
12 of 45 references.
References · 12
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,146
- 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,467
- 2025s1: Simple test-time scalingcited by 1,311
- 2024Large Language Monkeys: Scaling Inference Compute with Repeated Samplingcited by 946
- 2024DeepSeek-V3 Technical Reportcited by 724
- 2025Stop Overthinking: A Survey on Efficient Reasoning for Large Language Modelscited by 456
- 2025Jointly Reinforcing Diversity and Quality in Language Model Generationscited by 79
- 2025NoveltyBench: Evaluating Language Models for Humanlike Diversitycited by 64
- 2025Diverse Preference Optimizationcited by 48
- 2024Heads, Tails, and AI Fails: LLMs, Randomness, and Human Judgmentscited by 23
- 2025Enough Coin Flips Can Make LLMs Act Bayesiancited by 19
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 11.
11 papers.
- 2026Frontier Models Can Take Actions at Low Probabilitiescited by 3
- 2026Sampling More, Getting Less: Calibration is the Diversity Bottleneck in LLMscited by 2
- 2026Probabilistic Calibration Is a Trainable Capability in Language Modelscited by 2
- 2026Where You Inject Diversity Matters: A Unified Framework for Diverse Generationcited by 2
- 2026PAWBench: How Far Are We from Probabilistically Aligned World Modeling?cited by 0
- 2026Deep and shallow biases in language modelscited by 0
- 2026Forty Shades of Blue: Quality-Diversity Alignment via Mode-Conditioned Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
- 2026RoboTalk: Learning Multi-Robot Communication and Coordination from Multimodal Demonstrationscited by 0
- 2026Sample What You Say: Aligning Language Models to Sample the Distributions They Statecited by 0
- 2026Synthetic Data Characterization via Training Dynamicscited by 0
- 2026Gacha Decoding: Eliciting Diverse Generations Through Instruction Followingcited by 0
- 2026Gacha Decoding: Eliciting Diverse Generations Through Instruction Following1 Oct 2026
- 2026Synthetic Data Characterization via Training Dynamics30 Sep 2026
- 2026Sample What You Say: Aligning Language Models to Sample the Distributions They State28 Sep 2026
- 2026RoboTalk: Learning Multi-Robot Communication and Coordination from Multimodal Demonstrations21 Sep 2026
- 2026Forty Shades of Blue: Quality-Diversity Alignment via Mode-Conditioned Reinforcement Learning14 Sep 2026
- 2026Deep and shallow biases in language models9 Sep 2026
- 2026PAWBench: How Far Are We from Probabilistically Aligned World Modeling?27 Aug 2026
- 2026Where You Inject Diversity Matters: A Unified Framework for Diverse Generation9 Jun 2026
- 2026Probabilistic Calibration Is a Trainable Capability in Language Models12 May 2026
- 2026Sampling More, Getting Less: Calibration is the Diversity Bottleneck in LLMs11 May 2026
- 2026Frontier Models Can Take Actions at Low Probabilities2 Mar 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Rethinking the Role of Prompting Strategies in LLM Test-Time Scaling: A Perspective of Probability Theory
- 2024Towards Generalist Prompting for Large Language Models by Mental Models
- 2023StrategyLLM: Large Language Models as Strategy Generators, Executors, Optimizers, and Evaluators for Problem Solving
- 2026From Memorization to Creation: Evaluating the Cognitive Depth of LLM-Generated Educational Questions
- 2026Evaluating Prompting and Execution-Based Methods for Deterministic Computation in LLMs
- 2024KCIF: Knowledge-Conditioned Instruction Following
- 2024Unveiling the Statistical Foundations of Chain-of-Thought Prompting Methods
- 2023Synthetic Prompting: Generating Chain-of-Thought Demonstrations for Large Language Models