mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

String Seed of Thought: Prompting LLMs for Distribution-Faithful and Diverse Generation

arXiv 2510.21150 ↗First posted 24 Oct 2025cs.AIcited by 11

On the map: LLM reasoning → Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce String Seed of Thought (SSoT), a novel prompting method for LLMs that improves Probabilistic Instruction Following (PIF). We define PIF as a task requiring an LLM to select its answer from a predefined set of options, each associated with a specific probability, such that the empirical distribution of the generated answers aligns with the target distribution when prompted multiple times. While LLMs excel at tasks with single, deterministic answers, they often fail at PIF, exhibiting biases problematic for applications requiring non-deterministic behaviors, such as human-behavior simulation, content diversification, and multiplayer games. It also harms the diversity of generated responses, a crucial factor in test-time scaling, by causing the outputs to collapse into a limited set of answers. To address this, we propose SSoT, a simple prompting method that instructs an LLM to first output a random string to generate sufficient entropy. SSoT also instructs the LLM to extract randomness by manipulating this string to derive a final answer, thereby preserving diversity while adhering to specific constraints. We demonstrate that SSoT significantly improves the PIF performance of LLMs, approaching the ideal performance of a pseudo-random number generator. Furthermore, our experiments on NoveltyBench show SSoT's benefits extend beyond closed-set tasks to open-ended tasks by enhancing response diversity.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 12 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Oct 2025.

Builds on

12 of 45 references.

References · 12

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,146
  3. 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,467
  4. 2025s1: Simple test-time scalingcited by 1,311
  5. 2024Large Language Monkeys: Scaling Inference Compute with Repeated Samplingcited by 946
  6. 2024DeepSeek-V3 Technical Reportcited by 724
  7. 2025Stop Overthinking: A Survey on Efficient Reasoning for Large Language Modelscited by 456
  8. 2025Jointly Reinforcing Diversity and Quality in Language Model Generationscited by 79
  9. 2025NoveltyBench: Evaluating Language Models for Humanlike Diversitycited by 64
  10. 2025Diverse Preference Optimizationcited by 48
  11. 2024Heads, Tails, and AI Fails: LLMs, Randomness, and Human Judgmentscited by 23
  12. 2025Enough Coin Flips Can Make LLMs Act Bayesiancited by 19

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 11.

11 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Rethinking the Role of Prompting Strategies in LLM Test-Time Scaling: A Perspective of Probability Theory
  2. 2024Towards Generalist Prompting for Large Language Models by Mental Models
  3. 2023StrategyLLM: Large Language Models as Strategy Generators, Executors, Optimizers, and Evaluators for Problem Solving
  4. 2026From Memorization to Creation: Evaluating the Cognitive Depth of LLM-Generated Educational Questions
  5. 2026Evaluating Prompting and Execution-Based Methods for Deterministic Computation in LLMs
  6. 2024KCIF: Knowledge-Conditioned Instruction Following
  7. 2024Unveiling the Statistical Foundations of Chain-of-Thought Prompting Methods
  8. 2023Synthetic Prompting: Generating Chain-of-Thought Demonstrations for Large Language Models