Forty Shades of Blue: Quality-Diversity Alignment via Mode-Conditioned Reinforcement Learning
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Reward modeling and RLHF
Abstract (arXiv)
A notable byproduct of LLM alignment training is mode collapse: the progressive loss of output diversity that narrows a model's expressivity at inference time. This degradation is especially limiting for applications requiring open-ended exploration and pluralistic perspectives, such as scientific ideation and creative writing. We present MoDA (Mode-conditioned Diversity Alignment), an online post-training RL algorithm that jointly optimizes generation quality and diversity, inspired by the coordination perspective in multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL). MoDA trains a single shared LLM policy conditioned on abstract numbered roles, where each role acts as an agent competing to produce outputs distinct from the others. This formulation encourages mode-conditioned agents to explore complementary regions of the high-quality output space without requiring hand-crafted personas or architectural modifications. MoDA employs a prompt-adaptive quality gating mechanism that calibrates a reference quality threshold and grants diversity rewards only to responses that meet the threshold, preventing reward-hacking behaviors that compromise response quality. To study quality-diversity tradeoffs, we evaluate MoDA on a comprehensive suite of benchmarks spanning seven general capability tasks and four domain-specific diversity tasks in scientific ideation and creative writing. MoDA improves SBERT diversity by 265% on the Infinite-Chat held-out prompts, while increasing average general capability pass@1 by 10.3% over the Qwen3-8B baseline. Compared with the strongest DivPO baseline, MoDA improves SBERT diversity from 0.274 to 0.482 (+75.9%) and E-Vendi from 2.86 to 4.4 (+53.8%), while improving average general capability pass@1 by 7.0%. Overall, MoDA provides a drop-in alternative to standard post-training methods that preserves and expands the model's expressive output space while improving quality.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reward modeling and RLHF, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 51 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Sep 2026.
Builds on
51 of 71 references.
Closest ancestors · 3
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Skywork-Reward-V2: Scaling Preference Data Curation via Human-AI Synergy2 Jul
- 2024HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Framework28 Sep
- 2023Understanding the Effects of RLHF on LLM Generalisation and Diversity10 Oct
Other references · 48
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,944
- 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,100
- 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,916
- 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,879
- 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,183
- 2020MiniLM: Deep Self-Attention Distillation for Task-Agnostic Compression of Pre-Trained Transformerscited by 1,463
- 2023Instruction-Following Evaluation for Large Language Modelscited by 1,228
- 2018Diversity is All You Need: Learning Skills without a Reward Functioncited by 752
- 2022Out of One, Many: Using Language Models to Simulate Human Samplescited by 752
36 more
- 2023PyTorch FSDP: Experiences on Scaling Fully Sharded Data Parallelcited by 660
- 2023An Empirical Study of Catastrophic Forgetting in Large Language Models During Continual Fine-tuningcited by 639
- 2018Texygen: A Benchmarking Platform for Text Generation Modelscited by 491
- 2015Illuminating search spaces by mapping elitescited by 425
- 2022The Vendi Score: A Diversity Evaluation Metric for Machine Learningcited by 311
- 2023Does Writing with Language Models Reduce Content Diversity?cited by 192
- 2025Artificial Hivemind: The Open-Ended Homogeneity of Language Models (and Beyond)cited by 141
- 2024Homogenization Effects of Large Language Models on Human Creative Ideationcited by 127
- 2025Verbalized Sampling: How to Mitigate Mode Collapse and Unlock LLM Diversitycited by 105
- 2024Self-Improvement in Language Models: The Sharpening Mechanismcited by 104
- 2016Sequence Tutor: Conservative Fine-Tuning of Sequence Generation Models with KL-controlcited by 101
- 2021Celebrating Diversity in Shared Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 98
- 2025Rewarding the Unlikely: Lifting GRPO Beyond Distribution Sharpeningcited by 80
- 2019Comparison of Diverse Decoding Methods from Conditional Language Modelscited by 78
- 2025Diverse Preference Optimizationcited by 52
- 2025Evaluating the Diversity and Quality of LLM Generated Contentcited by 51
- 2025Base Models Beat Aligned Models at Randomness and Creativitycited by 51
- 2025Prismatic Synthesis: Gradient-based Data Diversification Boosts Generalization in LLM Reasoningcited by 40
- 2024Benchmarking Linguistic Diversity of Large Language Modelscited by 38
- 2025HypoBench: Towards Systematic and Principled Benchmarking for Hypothesis Generationcited by 37
- 2025The Homogenizing Effect of Large Language Models on Human Expression and Thoughtcited by 35
- 2025Enhancing Personalized Multi-Turn Dialogue with Curiosity Rewardcited by 27
- 2025Multilingual Prompting for Improving LLM Generation Diversitycited by 25
- 2025Diverse Preference Learning for Capabilities and Alignmentcited by 25
- 2024Learning to Cooperate with Humans using Generative Agentscited by 24
- 2024Dipper: Diversity in Prompts for Producing Large Language Model Ensembles in Reasoning taskscited by 22
- 2025Literature-Grounded Novelty Assessment of Scientific Ideascited by 19
- 2025Post-training Large Language Models for Diverse High-Quality Responsescited by 19
- 2025G2: Guided Generation for Enhanced Output Diversity in LLMscited by 14
- 2025String Seed of Thought: Prompting LLMs for Distribution-Faithful and Diverse Generationcited by 11
- 2025Group-Aware Reinforcement Learning for Output Diversity in Large Language Modelscited by 10
- 2025Towards Advanced Mathematical Reasoning for LLMs via First-Order Logic Theorem Provingcited by 8
- 2025Mode-Conditioning Unlocks Superior Test-Time Scalingcited by 8
- 2026Reaching Beyond the Mode: RL for Distributional Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 6
- 2025Multi-Novelty: Improve the Diversity and Novelty of Contents Generated by Large Language Models via inference-time Multi-Views Brainstormingcited by 4
- 2026Persona Switch: Mixing Distinct Perspectives in Decoding Timecited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026Sharpening Tax in Post-Trainingcited by 0
- 2026Sharpening Tax in Post-Training1 Oct 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Jointly Reinforcing Diversity and Quality in Language Model Generations
- 2023Integrating LLMs and Decision Transformers for Language Grounded Generative Quality-Diversity
- 2025Structured Diversity Control: A Dual-Level Framework for Group-Aware Multi-Agent Coordination
- 2026Behavioral Foundation Models for Quality Diversity
- 2026Many Ways to Succeed: Diversity-Driven RL Fine-Tuning for VLA Generalization
- 2024Controlling Behavioral Diversity in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
- 2026Learning Generalizable Behaviors for Terminal Agents
- 2023Quality Diversity through Human Feedback: Towards Open-Ended Diversity-Driven Optimization