mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Probabilistic Calibration Is a Trainable Capability in Language Models

arXiv 2605.11845 ↗First posted 12 May 2026cs.CLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Language models are increasingly used in settings where outputs should follow an intended distribution, yet their generation probabilities are often poorly calibrated to it. In many such requests the distribution is implicit and the valid outputs cannot be listed in advance, so the task cannot be passed to an external random number generator. We study whether this capability can be improved directly through fine-tuning. Concretely, we fine-tune language models on synthetic prompts that require sampling from mathematical distributions, and compare two Calibration Fine-Tuning variants: a soft-target method that converts the desired output distribution into trie-derived next-token targets, and a hard-target method that trains on sampled completions from the same target distribution. Across 12 models spanning four families, both methods substantially improve structured-sampling fidelity on held-out distribution families and unseen parameter settings, showing that training on cheap synthetic mathematical distributions improves sampling on unseen distributions, even in natural language. The gains also transfer to broader stochastic generation benchmarks, including open-ended random generation, where fine-tuned models broaden their first-token support by one to two orders of magnitude, and NoveltyBench. The gains sometimes reduce downstream capability, especially arithmetic reasoning, with costs varying by model. Overall, our results show that probabilistic calibration can be improved through fine-tuning with either objective, and that calibration learned on mathematical distributions transfers to natural-language stochastic generation. Code is available at https://github.com/chandar-lab/calibration-finetuning.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 May 2026.

Builds on

23 of 29 references.

References · 23

  1. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
  2. 2025gpt-oss-120b & gpt-oss-20b Model Cardcited by 1,386
  3. 2023Understanding the Effects of RLHF on LLM Generalisation and Diversitycited by 396
  4. 2024tinyBenchmarks: evaluating LLMs with fewer examplescited by 310
  5. 2023Generative artificial intelligence enhances creativity but reduces the diversity of novel contentcited by 167
  6. 2024On the Algorithmic Bias of Aligning Large Language Models with RLHF: Preference Collapse and Matching Regularizationcited by 72
  7. 2025NoveltyBench: Evaluating Language Models for Humanlike Diversitycited by 66
  8. 2023Paloma: A Benchmark for Evaluating Language Model Fitcited by 54
  9. 2024Forcing Diffuse Distributions out of Language Modelscited by 48
  10. 2024Creativity Has Left the Chat: The Price of Debiasing Language Modelscited by 29
  11. 2025Your Pre-trained LLM is Secretly an Unsupervised Confidence Calibratorcited by 20
  12. 2025What and Whose Knowledge? Measuring Epistemic Diversity in Large Language Modelscited by 14
11 more
  1. 2025String Seed of Thought: Prompting LLMs for Distribution-Faithful and Diverse Generationcited by 11
  2. 2022Adaptive Label Smoothing with Self-Knowledge in Natural Language Generationcited by 9
  3. 2026The Illusion of Stochasticity in LLMscited by 9
  4. 2025Flipping Against All Odds: Reducing LLM Coin Flip Bias via Verbalized Rejection Samplingcited by 7
  5. 2026Large Language Models Are Bad Dice Players: LLMs Struggle to Generate Random Numbers from Statistical Distributionscited by 6
  6. 2025Generative AI and Creativity: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysiscited by 5
  7. 2025Beyond Single-Point Judgment: Distribution Alignment for LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 4
  8. 2025The Role of Teacher Calibration in Knowledge Distillationcited by 4
  9. 2025Evaluating the Quality of Randomness and Entropy in Tasks Supported by Large Language Modelscited by 3
  10. 2026Inducing Sustained Creativity and Diversity in Large Language Modelscited by 2
  11. 2026TabKD: Tabular Knowledge Distillation through Interaction Diversity of Learned Feature Binscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Calibration vs Decision Making: Revisiting the Reliability Paradox in Unlearned Language Models
  2. 2025Efficient Response Generation Strategy Selection for Fine-Tuning Large Language Models Through Self-Aligned Perplexity
  3. 2025Reasoning Under Uncertainty: Exploring Probabilistic Reasoning Capabilities of LLMs
  4. 2023On the Calibration of Large Language Models and Alignment
  5. 2026Mutual Debiasing via Dual-Seed Comparison for Probabilistic Sampling in Large Language Models
  6. 2026A Calibrated Instrument for Measuring How Inference Optimizations Affect Output Quality
  7. 2026Target-Aware Calibration Data Selection for Preserving Uncertainty in Quantized Language Models
  8. 2026Rethinking Uncertainty Evaluation in Large Language Models