mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Self-Supervised Reinforcement Learning Approach for Fine-Tuning Large Language Models Using Cross-Attention Signals

arXiv 2502.10482 ↗First posted 14 Feb 2025cs.AIcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We propose a novel reinforcement learning framework for post training large language models that does not rely on human in the loop feedback. Instead, our approach uses cross attention signals within the model itself to derive a self supervised reward, thereby guiding iterative fine tuning of the model policy. By analyzing how the model attends to the input prompt during generation, we construct measures of prompt coverage, focus, and coherence. We then use these measures to rank or score candidate responses, providing a reward signal that encourages the model to produce well aligned, on topic text. In empirical comparisons against standard policy gradient methods and RL fine tuning with synthetic preference models, our method shows significant gains in prompt relevance and consistency over a non RL baseline. While it does not yet match the performance of fully human supervised RLHF systems, it highlights an important direction for scaling alignment with minimal human labeling. We provide a detailed analysis, discuss potential limitations, and outline future work for combining cross-attention based signals with smaller amounts of human feedback.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Feb 2025.

Builds on

10 of 15 references.

References · 10

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  4. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  5. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
  6. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
  7. 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,881
  8. 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,124
  9. 2019Attention is not Explanationcited by 916
  10. 2019Is Attention Interpretable?cited by 387

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 3.

7 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Self-Rewarding PPO: Aligning Large Language Models with Demonstrations Only
  2. 2024Extensive Self-Contrast Enables Feedback-Free Language Model Alignment
  3. 2024Self-Exploring Language Models: Active Preference Elicitation for Online Alignment
  4. 2024Aligning Large Language Models via Fine-grained Supervision
  5. 2023Guiding Large Language Models via Directional Stimulus Prompting
  6. 2024Aligning Large Language Models by On-Policy Self-Judgment
  7. 2024Sequence to Sequence Reward Modeling: Improving RLHF by Language Feedback
  8. 2023SuperHF: Supervised Iterative Learning from Human Feedback