A Model Can Help Itself: Reward-Free Self-Training for LLM Reasoning
On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking
also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)
Can a language model improve reasoning by learning from its own imperfect responses, without rewards or teacher-provided solutions? We present Self-evolving Post-Training (SePT), a simple method that alternates temperature-controlled self-generation with next-token likelihood training. Each round uses the updated model to generate new training responses, with one response per prompt by default and no correctness filtering. Across six mathematical benchmarks, SePT improves a temperature-selected no-training baseline by 11.4 and 6.7 AVG points on Qwen2.5-Math-7B and Qwen2.5-7B, respectively, where AVG averages Pass@1, Pass@8 and Pass@32 across benchmarks. We analyze how sampling temperature shapes the learning signal and investigate the value of the resulting responses. Responses from a SePT-trained model improve a student initialized from the original weights, while their reasoning prefixes help an unchanged model complete solutions, even when matched in length to prefixes from a colder initial model. Comparing next-token predictions at identical contexts also reveals changes in token rankings that decoding-temperature adjustment cannot reproduce. Further evaluations across nine starting models, general reasoning and code generation examine broader applicability. Together, these results show that reward-free self-training can improve both a model's predictions and the supervision it provides. Our code is available at https://github.com/ElementQi/SePT.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 55 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Oct 2025.
Builds on
55 of 71 references.
Closest ancestors · 4
Same direction, newest first
- 2025The Illusion of Thinking: Understanding the Strengths and Limitations of Reasoning Models via the Lens of Problem Complexity7 Jun
- 2025Stop Overthinking: A Survey on Efficient Reasoning for Large Language Models20 Mar
- 2025s1: Simple test-time scaling31 Jan
- 2022STaR: Bootstrapping Reasoning With Reasoning28 Mar
Other references · 51
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
- 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,942
- 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
- 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 3,019
38 more
- 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,879
- 2025DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scalecited by 2,810
- 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,724
- 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,592
- 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,580
- 2024HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Frameworkcited by 2,057
- 2024LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Codecited by 2,004
- 2024MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,848
- 2022Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Themcited by 1,807
- 2023LongBench: A Bilingual, Multitask Benchmark for Long Context Understandingcited by 1,417
- 2022Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language Modelscited by 1,392
- 2023Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 1,391
- 2025Understanding R1-Zero-Like Training: A Critical Perspectivecited by 1,345
- 2023Instruction-Following Evaluation for Large Language Modelscited by 1,228
- 2024OlympiadBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Promoting AGI with Olympiad-Level Bilingual Multimodal Scientific Problemscited by 1,136
- 2025Does Reinforcement Learning Really Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model?cited by 982
- 2023On-Policy Distillation of Language Models: Learning from Self-Generated Mistakescited by 939
- 2025Group Sequence Policy Optimizationcited by 835
- 2021Did Aristotle Use a Laptop? A Question Answering Benchmark with Implicit Reasoning Strategiescited by 743
- 2025Beyond the 80/20 Rule: High-Entropy Minority Tokens Drive Effective Reinforcement Learning for LLM Reasoningcited by 559
- 2018Born Again Neural Networkscited by 546
- 2025SimpleRL-Zoo: Investigating and Taming Zero Reinforcement Learning for Open Base Models in the Wildcited by 511
- 2025LIMO: Less is More for Reasoningcited by 498
- 2025The Entropy Mechanism of Reinforcement Learning for Reasoning Language Modelscited by 485
- 2025Open-Reasoner-Zero: An Open Source Approach to Scaling Up Reinforcement Learning on the Base Modelcited by 461
- 2025Reasoning Models Don't Always Say What They Thinkcited by 415
- 2025OpenThoughts: Data Recipes for Reasoning Modelscited by 304
- 2025Reinforcement Learning for Reasoning in Large Language Models with One Training Examplecited by 295
- 2025TTRL: Test-Time Reinforcement Learningcited by 275
- 2025Spurious Rewards: Rethinking Training Signals in RLVRcited by 209
- 2023MuSR: Testing the Limits of Chain-of-thought with Multistep Soft Reasoningcited by 201
- 2023ReMax: A Simple, Effective, and Efficient Reinforcement Learning Method for Aligning Large Language Modelscited by 187
- 2025Light-R1: Curriculum SFT, DPO and RL for Long COT from Scratch and Beyondcited by 175
- 2025The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Entropy Minimization in LLM Reasoningcited by 166
- 2025LLMs Can Easily Learn to Reason from Demonstrations Structure, not content, is what matters!cited by 132
- 2024Self-Improvement in Language Models: The Sharpening Mechanismcited by 104
- 2025Reasoning with Sampling: Your Base Model is Smarter Than You Thinkcited by 89
- 2025rStar-Coder: Scaling Competitive Code Reasoning with a Large-Scale Verified Datasetcited by 51
50 most cited of 51 All 51 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Incentivizing LLMs to Self-Verify Their Answers
- 2024Self-training Language Models for Arithmetic Reasoning
- 2026Peer-Predictive Self-Training for Language Model Reasoning
- 2025The Self-Improvement Paradox: Can Language Models Bootstrap Reasoning Capabilities without External Scaffolding?
- 2022Large Language Models Can Self-Improve
- 2025Self-rewarding correction for mathematical reasoning
- 2024Enhancing LLM Reasoning via Critique Models with Test-Time and Training-Time Supervision
- 2026On the Generalization Gap in Self-Evolving Language Model Reasoning