Reinforcement Learning with Imperfect Transition Predictions: A Bellman-Jensen Approach
On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → RL theory and sample complexity
Abstract (arXiv)
Traditional reinforcement learning (RL) assumes the agents make decisions based on Markov decision processes (MDPs) with one-step transition models. In many real-world applications, such as energy management and stock investment, agents can access multi-step predictions of future states, which provide additional advantages for decision making. However, multi-step predictions are inherently high-dimensional: naively embedding these predictions into an MDP leads to an exponential blow-up in state space and the curse of dimensionality. Moreover, existing RL theory provides few tools to analyze prediction-augmented MDPs, as it typically works on one-step transition kernels and cannot accommodate multi-step predictions with errors or partial action-coverage. We address these challenges with three key innovations: First, we propose the Bayesian value function to characterize the optimal prediction-aware policy tractably. Second, we develop a novel Bellman-Jensen Gap analysis on the Bayesian value function, which enables characterizing the value of imperfect predictions. Third, we introduce BOLA (Bayesian Offline Learning with Online Adaptation), a two-stage model-based RL algorithm that separates offline Bayesian value learning from lightweight online adaptation to real-time predictions. We prove that BOLA remains sample-efficient even under imperfect predictions. We validate our theory and algorithm on synthetic MDPs and a real-world wind energy storage control problem.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in RL theory and sample complexity, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. Builds on 35 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Oct 2025.
Builds on
35 of 71 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
- 2024Overcoming the Curse of Dimensionality in Reinforcement Learning Through Approximate Factorization12 Nov
Other references · 34
- 2018Computational Optimal Transportcited by 780
- 2019Provably Efficient Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximationcited by 520
- 2017Minimax Regret Bounds for Reinforcement Learningcited by 503
- 2019Model-Based Reinforcement Learning for Ataricited by 502
- 2018A Finite Time Analysis of Temporal Difference Learning With Linear Function Approximationcited by 229
- 2019Finite-Time Error Bounds For Linear Stochastic Approximation and TD Learningcited by 166
- 2019Model-Based Reinforcement Learning with a Generative Model is Minimax Optimalcited by 127
- 2020Breaking the Sample Size Barrier in Model-Based Reinforcement Learning with a Generative Modelcited by 109
- 2020Deep Reinforcement Learning for Intelligent Transportation Systems: A Surveycited by 98
- 2020Reinforcement Learning in Economics and Financecited by 58
- 2021Breaking the Sample Complexity Barrier to Regret-Optimal Model-Free Reinforcement Learningcited by 53
- 2021Reinforcement Learning for Selective Key Applications in Power Systems: Recent Advances and Future Challengescited by 50
22 more
- 2018Reinforcement Learning for UAV Attitude Controlcited by 48
- 2014Near-optimal Reinforcement Learning in Factored MDPscited by 41
- 2022Near-Optimal Sample Complexity Bounds for Constrained MDPscited by 37
- 2022Provably Efficient Reinforcement Learning in Partially Observable Dynamical Systemscited by 35
- 2021Towards Tight Bounds on the Sample Complexity of Average-reward MDPscited by 33
- 2020The Power of Predictions in Online Controlcited by 31
- 2022Target Network and Truncation Overcome The Deadly Triad in Q-Learningcited by 31
- 2018Online Optimization with Predictions and Switching Costs: Fast Algorithms and the Fundamental Limitcited by 27
- 2021Perturbation-based Regret Analysis of Predictive Control in Linear Time Varying Systemscited by 25
- 2021On the Regret Analysis of Online LQR Control with Predictionscited by 22
- 2018Beyond the One Step Greedy Approach in Reinforcement Learningcited by 20
- 2015Online Convex Optimization Using Predictionscited by 16
- 2022Bounded-Regret MPC via Perturbation Analysis: Prediction Error, Constraints, and Nonlinearitycited by 16
- 2021Can Q-Learning be Improved with Advice?cited by 13
- 2019Online Optimization with Predictions and Non-convex Lossescited by 12
- 2020Leveraging Predictions in Smoothed Online Convex Optimization via Gradient-based Algorithmscited by 12
- 2022Planning and Learning with Adaptive Lookaheadcited by 8
- 2023Beyond Black-Box Advice: Learning-Augmented Algorithms for MDPs with Q-Value Predictionscited by 8
- 2020Lookahead-Bounded Q-Learningcited by 5
- 2021The Role of Lookahead and Approximate Policy Evaluation in Reinforcement Learning with Linear Value Function Approximationcited by 5
- 2024Predictive Control and Regret Analysis of Non-Stationary MDP with Look-ahead Informationcited by 2
- 2025Efficiently Solving Discounted MDPs with Predictions on Transition Matricescited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026RL-PaO: Prediction as Action in Decision Making under Uncertainty
- 2025Model-Based Reinforcement Learning Under Confounding
- 2026Mathematical methods of reinforcement learning
- 2022Conservative Bayesian Model-Based Value Expansion for Offline Policy Optimization
- 2026A Unified Algorithmic Framework for Hybrid Reinforcement Learning in Tabular MDPs with Shifted Transition Dynamics
- 2024Taming "data-hungry" reinforcement learning? Stability in continuous state-action spaces
- 2025Robust Bayesian Dynamic Programming for On-policy Risk-sensitive Reinforcement Learning
- 2025Long-Horizon Model-Based Offline Reinforcement Learning Without Explicit Conservatism