mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Overcoming the Curse of Dimensionality in Reinforcement Learning Through Approximate Factorization

arXiv 2411.07591 ↗First posted 12 Nov 2024cs.LGcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement Learning (RL) algorithms are known to suffer from the curse of dimensionality, which refers to the fact that large-scale problems often lead to exponentially high sample complexity. A common solution is to use deep neural networks for function approximation; however, such approaches typically lack theoretical guarantees. To provably address the curse of dimensionality, we observe that many real-world problems exhibit task-specific model structures that, when properly leveraged, can improve the sample efficiency of RL. Building on this insight, we propose overcoming the curse of dimensionality by approximately factorizing the original Markov decision processes (MDPs) into smaller, independently evolving MDPs. This factorization enables the development of sample-efficient RL algorithms in both model-based and model-free settings, with the latter involving a variant of variance-reduced Q-learning. We provide improved sample complexity guarantees for both proposed algorithms. Notably, by leveraging model structure through the approximate factorization of the MDP, the dependence of sample complexity on the size of the state-action space can be exponentially reduced. Numerically, we demonstrate the practicality of our proposed methods through experiments on both synthetic MDP tasks and a wind farm-equipped storage control problem.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Nov 2024.

Builds on

11 of 65 references.

References · 11

  1. 2019Provably Efficient Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximationcited by 514
  2. 2020Breaking the Sample Size Barrier in Model-Based Reinforcement Learning with a Generative Modelcited by 108
  3. 2021Is Q-Learning Minimax Optimal? A Tight Sample Complexity Analysiscited by 89
  4. 2019Stochastic approximation with cone-contractive operators: Sharp ℓ_∞-bounds for Q-learningcited by 74
  5. 2019Variance-reduced Q-learning is minimax optimalcited by 72
  6. 2023The Curious Price of Distributional Robustness in Reinforcement Learning with a Generative Modelcited by 50
  7. 2019A Finite-Time Analysis of Q-Learning with Neural Network Function Approximationcited by 47
  8. 2020Efficient Reinforcement Learning in Factored MDPs with Application to Constrained RLcited by 16
  9. 2023Sample Efficient Reinforcement Learning in Mixed Systems through Augmented Samples and Its Applications to Queueing Networkscited by 9
  10. 2017SBEED: Convergent Reinforcement Learning with Nonlinear Function Approximationcited by 4
  11. 2024A General Control-Theoretic Approach for Reinforcement Learning: Theory and Algorithmscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 2.

6 papers.