mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Planning and Learning with Adaptive Lookahead

arXiv 2201.12403 ↗First posted 28 Jan 2022cs.LG cs.AIcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Some of the most powerful reinforcement learning frameworks use planning for action selection. Interestingly, their planning horizon is either fixed or determined arbitrarily by the state visitation history. Here, we expand beyond the naive fixed horizon and propose a theoretically justified strategy for adaptive selection of the planning horizon as a function of the state-dependent value estimate. We propose two variants for lookahead selection and analyze the trade-off between iteration count and computational complexity per iteration. We then devise a corresponding deep Q-network algorithm with an adaptive tree search horizon. We separate the value estimation per depth to compensate for the off-policy discrepancy between depths. Lastly, we demonstrate the efficacy of our adaptive lookahead method in a maze environment and Atari.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Jan 2022.

Builds on

14 of 24 references.

References · 14

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  2. 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
  3. 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,211
  4. 2019Mastering Atari, Go, Chess and Shogi by Planning with a Learned Modelcited by 1,327
  5. 2017Rainbow: Combining Improvements in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 774
  6. 2020Learning Off-Policy with Online Planningcited by 46
  7. 2021Acting in Delayed Environments with Non-Stationary Markov Policiescited by 28
  8. 2013Improved and Generalized Upper Bounds on the Complexity of Policy Iterationcited by 21
  9. 2018Beyond the One Step Greedy Approach in Reinforcement Learningcited by 20
  10. 2018How to Combine Tree-Search Methods in Reinforcement Learningcited by 16
  11. 2021On Covariate Shift of Latent Confounders in Imitation and Reinforcement Learningcited by 14
  12. 2021Improve Agents without Retraining: Parallel Tree Search with Off-Policy Correctioncited by 10
2 more
  1. 2018Multiple-Step Greedy Policies in Online and Approximate Reinforcement Learningcited by 7
  2. 2020Think Too Fast Nor Too Slow: The Computational Trade-off Between Planning And Reinforcement Learningcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

8 papers.