R2L: Reliable Reinforcement Learning: Guaranteed Return & Reliable Policies in Reinforcement Learning
On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → Safe and constrained RL
Abstract (arXiv)
In this work, we address the problem of determining reliable policies in reinforcement learning (RL), with a focus on optimization under uncertainty and the need for performance guarantees. While classical RL algorithms aim at maximizing the expected return, many real-world applications - such as routing, resource allocation, or sequential decision-making under risk - require strategies that ensure not only high average performance but also a guaranteed probability of success. To this end, we propose a novel formulation in which the objective is to maximize the probability that the cumulative return exceeds a prescribed threshold. We demonstrate that this reliable RL problem can be reformulated, via a state-augmented representation, into a standard RL problem, thereby allowing the use of existing RL and deep RL algorithms without the need for entirely new algorithmic frameworks. Theoretical results establish the equivalence of the two formulations and show that reliable strategies can be derived by appropriately adapting well-known methods such as Q-learning or Dueling Double DQN. To illustrate the practical relevance of the approach, we consider the problem of reliable routing, where the goal is not to minimize the expected travel time but rather to maximize the probability of reaching the destination within a given time budget. Numerical experiments confirm that the proposed formulation leads to policies that effectively balance efficiency and reliability, highlighting the potential of reliable RL for applications in stochastic and safety-critical environments.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Safe and constrained RL, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. Builds on 15 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Oct 2025.
Builds on
15 of 54 references.
References · 15
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,580
- 2015Deep Reinforcement Learning with Double Q-learningcited by 1,745
- 2015Prioritized Experience Replaycited by 1,099
- 2017Rainbow: Combining Improvements in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 786
- 2017A Distributional Perspective on Reinforcement Learningcited by 765
- 2015Risk-Constrained Reinforcement Learning with Percentile Risk Criteriacited by 337
- 2013Risk-sensitive Reinforcement Learningcited by 130
- 2014Optimizing the CVaR via Samplingcited by 99
- 2019A Comparative Analysis of Expected and Distributional Reinforcement Learningcited by 47
- 2016Risk Aversion in Finite Markov Decision Processes Using Total Cost Criteria and Average Value at Riskcited by 9
- 2015Risk-Averse Approximate Dynamic Programming with Quantile-Based Risk Measurescited by 6
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Provably Safe, Yet Scalable Reinforcement Learning
- 2022A Review of Safe Reinforcement Learning: Methods, Theory and Applications
- 2024Safe and Robust Reinforcement Learning: Principles and Practice
- 2026A Survey on the Verification of Reinforcement Learning Policies
- 2025A Provable Approach for End-to-End Safe Reinforcement Learning
- 2022On Practical Reinforcement Learning: Provable Robustness, Scalability, and Statistical Efficiency
- 2026Sampling-Based Safe Reinforcement Learning
- 2026CORE-RL: Confidence-Oriented Reliability Evaluation of Black-Box Reinforcement Learning Policies