Watermarking for Proprietary Dataset Protection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A growing body of literature suggests that training data membership inference problems are fundamentally hard tasks in modern language modeling settings. We argue that output watermarking techniques are the right gadget to make training membership tests for generative models more tractable, based on prior results showing that language models exhibit residual watermark "radioactivity" under partially watermarked training datasets. We pit a watermark-based dataset inference approach head-to-head against traditional loss-based membership inference methods and show that watermarking can achieve comparable membership detection performance when subset exposure is high enough, under an alternate set of assumptions.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jul 2026.
Builds on
16 of 19 references.
References · 16
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
- 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,144
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,714
- 2021Membership Inference Attacks From First Principlescited by 839
- 2023A Watermark for Large Language Modelscited by 667
- 2023Detecting Pretraining Data from Large Language Modelscited by 375
- 2024Do Membership Inference Attacks Work on Large Language Models?cited by 188
- 2022Datamodels: Predicting Predictions from Training Datacited by 186
- 2023Mark My Words: Analyzing and Evaluating Language Model Watermarkscited by 62
- 2024Watermarking Makes Language Models Radioactivecited by 52
- 2025Extracting memorized pieces of (copyrighted) books from open-weight language modelscited by 27
- 2025Language Models May Verbatim Complete Text They Were Not Explicitly Trained Oncited by 20
4 more
Built on by
Not cited yet.