mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

MoM: Mixtures of Scenario-Aware Document Memories for Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems

arXiv 2510.14252 ↗First posted 16 Oct 2025cs.CLcited by 1

On the map: LLM reasoning → Knowledge- and tool-augmented reasoning

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

The traditional RAG paradigm, which typically engages in the comprehension of relevant text chunks in response to received queries, inherently restricts both the depth of knowledge internalization and reasoning capabilities. To address this limitation, our research transforms the text processing in RAG from passive chunking to proactive understanding, defining this process as document memory extraction with the objective of simulating human cognitive processes during reading. Building upon this, we propose the Mixtures of scenario-aware document Memories (MoM) framework, engineered to efficiently handle documents from multiple domains and train small language models (SLMs) to acquire the ability to proactively explore and construct document memories. The MoM initially instructs large language models (LLMs) to simulate domain experts in generating document logical outlines, thereby directing structured chunking and core content extraction. It employs a multi-path sampling and multi-perspective evaluation mechanism, specifically designing comprehensive metrics that represent chunk clarity and extraction completeness to select the optimal document memories. Additionally, to infuse deeper human-like reading abilities during the training of SLMs, we incorporate a reverse reasoning strategy, which deduces refined expert thinking paths from high-quality outcomes. Finally, leveraging diverse forms of content generated by MoM, we develop a three-layer document memory retrieval mechanism, which is grounded in our theoretical proof from the perspective of probabilistic modeling. Extensive experimental results across three distinct domains demonstrate that the MoM framework not only resolves text chunking challenges in existing RAG systems, providing LLMs with semantically complete document memories, but also paves the way for SLMs to achieve human-centric intelligent text processing.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Knowledge- and tool-augmented reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 23 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Oct 2025.

Builds on

23 of 30 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Survey18 Dec

Other references · 22

  1. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
  2. 2020REALM: Retrieval-Augmented Language Model Pre-Trainingcited by 2,141
  3. 2023LongBench: A Bilingual, Multitask Benchmark for Long Context Understandingcited by 1,417
  4. 2025Mem0: Building Production-Ready AI Agents with Scalable Long-Term Memorycited by 779
  5. 2025Agentic Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Survey on Agentic RAGcited by 249
  6. 2022Rethinking with Retrieval: Faithful Large Language Model Inferencecited by 145
  7. 2024MemoRAG: Boosting Long Context Processing with Global Memory-Enhanced Retrieval Augmentationcited by 119
  8. 2023Dense X Retrieval: What Retrieval Granularity Should We Use?cited by 88
  9. 2024DRAGIN: Dynamic Retrieval Augmented Generation based on the Information Needs of Large Language Modelscited by 63
  10. 2023Are ChatGPT and GPT-4 General-Purpose Solvers for Financial Text Analytics? A Study on Several Typical Taskscited by 59
  11. 2024CRUD-RAG: A Comprehensive Chinese Benchmark for Retrieval-Augmented Generation of Large Language Modelscited by 50
  12. 2024Internal Consistency and Self-Feedback in Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 50
10 more
  1. 2024Don't Forget to Connect! Improving RAG with Graph-based Rerankingcited by 49
  2. 2024Hallucination Detection: Robustly Discerning Reliable Answers in Large Language Modelscited by 44
  3. 2024Is Semantic Chunking Worth the Computational Cost?cited by 43
  4. 2024LumberChunker: Long-Form Narrative Document Segmentationcited by 36
  5. 2025A Systematic Review of Key Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) Systems: Progress, Gaps, and Future Directionscited by 31
  6. 2024OmniEval: An Omnidirectional and Automatic RAG Evaluation Benchmark in Financial Domaincited by 29
  7. 2025MoC: Mixtures of Text Chunking Learners for Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systemcited by 19
  8. 2023BERM: Training the Balanced and Extractable Representation for Matching to Improve Generalization Ability of Dense Retrievalcited by 11
  9. 2024CCI3.0-HQ: a large-scale Chinese dataset of high quality designed for pre-training large language modelscited by 11
  10. 2024Humanlike Cognitive Patterns as Emergent Phenomena in Large Language Modelscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Equipping Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models with Document Structure Awareness
  2. 2025HIRAG: Hierarchical-Thought Instruction-Tuning Retrieval-Augmented Generation
  3. 2025Mindscape-Aware Retrieval Augmented Generation for Improved Long Context Understanding
  4. 2026Query-Adaptive Semantic Chunking for Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Dynamic Strategy with Contextual Window Expansion
  5. 2025Enhancing Retrieval Augmented Generation with Hierarchical Text Segmentation Chunking
  6. 2025Direct Retrieval-augmented Optimization: Synergizing Knowledge Selection and Language Models
  7. 2025Reconstructing Context: Evaluating Advanced Chunking Strategies for Retrieval-Augmented Generation
  8. 2024Unveiling and Consulting Core Experts in Retrieval-Augmented MoE-based LLMs