mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Unveiling and Consulting Core Experts in Retrieval-Augmented MoE-based LLMs

arXiv 2410.15438 ↗First posted 20 Oct 2024cs.AIcited by 1

On the map: Retrieval-augmented generation → RAG pipeline design and evaluation

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) significantly improved the ability of Large Language Models (LLMs) to solve knowledge-intensive tasks. While existing research seeks to enhance RAG performance by retrieving higher-quality documents or designing RAG-specific LLMs, the internal mechanisms within LLMs that contribute to the effectiveness of RAG systems remain underexplored. In this paper, we aim to investigate these internal mechanisms within the popular Mixture-of-Expert (MoE)-based LLMs and demonstrate how to improve RAG by examining expert activations in these LLMs. Our controlled experiments reveal that several core groups of experts are primarily responsible for RAG-related behaviors. The activation of these core experts can signify the model's inclination towards external/internal knowledge and adjust its behavior. For instance, we identify core experts that can (1) indicate the sufficiency of the model's internal knowledge, (2) assess the quality of retrieved documents, and (3) enhance the model's ability to utilize context. Based on these findings, we propose several strategies to enhance RAG's efficiency and effectiveness through expert activation. Experimental results across various datasets and MoE-based LLMs show the effectiveness of our method.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in RAG pipeline design and evaluation, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation. Builds on 26 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Oct 2024.

Builds on

26 of 32 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Bridging the Preference Gap between Retrievers and LLMs13 Jan
  2. 2023Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Survey18 Dec

Other references · 24

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  3. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
  4. 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,326
  5. 2017Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layercited by 3,509
  6. 2020REALM: Retrieval-Augmented Language Model Pre-Trainingcited by 2,141
  7. 2023Self-RAG: Learning to Retrieve, Generate, and Critique through Self-Reflectioncited by 1,839
  8. 2021Improving language models by retrieving from trillions of tokenscited by 1,293
  9. 2022When Not to Trust Language Models: Investigating Effectiveness of Parametric and Non-Parametric Memoriescited by 1,128
  10. 2021GLaM: Efficient Scaling of Language Models with Mixture-of-Expertscited by 897
  11. 2023Large Language Models Can Be Easily Distracted by Irrelevant Contextcited by 841
  12. 2022Mixture-of-Experts with Expert Choice Routingcited by 623
12 more
  1. 2023Adaptive Chameleon or Stubborn Sloth: Revealing the Behavior of Large Language Models in Knowledge Conflictscited by 341
  2. 2023Trusting Your Evidence: Hallucinate Less with Context-aware Decodingcited by 327
  3. 2023RA-DIT: Retrieval-Augmented Dual Instruction Tuningcited by 195
  4. 2024OpenMoE: An Early Effort on Open Mixture-of-Experts Language Modelscited by 187
  5. 2022On the Representation Collapse of Sparse Mixture of Expertscited by 157
  6. 2023Investigating the Factual Knowledge Boundary of Large Language Models with Retrieval Augmentationcited by 147
  7. 2020Factual Error Correction for Abstractive Summarization Modelscited by 108
  8. 2023Characterizing Mechanisms for Factual Recall in Language Modelscited by 48
  9. 2023Deficiency of Large Language Models in Finance: An Empirical Examination of Hallucinationcited by 41
  10. 2023Clinfo.ai: An Open-Source Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Model System for Answering Medical Questions using Scientific Literaturecited by 29
  11. 2024PatentGPT: A Large Language Model for Intellectual Propertycited by 8
  12. 2023I3: Intent-Introspective Retrieval Conditioned on Instructionscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Dynamic and Parametric Retrieval-Augmented Generation
  2. 2024Long-Context LLMs Meet RAG: Overcoming Challenges for Long Inputs in RAG
  3. 2024Deploying Large Language Models With Retrieval Augmented Generation
  4. 2024A Survey on RAG Meeting LLMs: Towards Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models
  5. 2025When Retrieval Succeeds and Fails: Rethinking Retrieval-Augmented Generation for LLMs
  6. 2025Retrieval Augmented Generation Evaluation in the Era of Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey
  7. 2024A Comprehensive Survey of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG): Evolution, Current Landscape and Future Directions
  8. 2024Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) and Beyond: A Comprehensive Survey on How to Make your LLMs use External Data More Wisely