mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ConsintBench: Evaluating Language Models on Real-World Consumer Intent Understanding

arXiv 2510.13499 ↗First posted 15 Oct 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 2

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation

Abstract (arXiv)

Understanding human intent is a complex, high-level task for large language models (LLMs), requiring analytical reasoning, contextual interpretation, dynamic information aggregation, and decision-making under uncertainty. Real-world public discussions, such as consumer product discussions, are rarely linear or involve a single user. Instead, they are characterized by interwoven and often conflicting perspectives, divergent concerns, goals, emotional tendencies, as well as implicit assumptions and background knowledge about usage scenarios. To accurately understand such explicit public intent, an LLM must go beyond parsing individual sentences; it must integrate multi-source signals, reason over inconsistencies, and adapt to evolving discourse, similar to how experts in fields like politics, economics, or finance approach complex, uncertain environments. Despite the importance of this capability, no large-scale benchmark currently exists for evaluating LLMs on real-world human intent understanding, primarily due to the challenges of collecting real-world public discussion data and constructing a robust evaluation pipeline. To bridge this gap, we introduce bench, the first dynamic, live evaluation benchmark specifically designed for intent understanding, particularly in the consumer domain. bench is the largest and most diverse benchmark of its kind, supporting real-time updates while preventing data contamination through an automated curation pipeline.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 32 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Oct 2025.

Builds on

32 of 49 references.

References · 32

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  3. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  4. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  5. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  6. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  7. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
  8. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  9. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,146
  10. 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,304
  11. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
  12. 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,854
20 more
  1. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
  2. 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,509
  3. 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,193
  4. 2024Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of contextcited by 3,175
  5. 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,919
  6. 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,970
  7. 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,793
  8. 2019SuperGLUE: A Stickier Benchmark for General-Purpose Language Understanding Systemscited by 1,718
  9. 2023Instruction-Following Evaluation for Large Language Modelscited by 1,143
  10. 2024OSWorld: Benchmarking Multimodal Agents for Open-Ended Tasks in Real Computer Environmentscited by 1,134
  11. 2023GAIA: a benchmark for General AI Assistantscited by 1,084
  12. 2015A Diversity-Promoting Objective Function for Neural Conversation Modelscited by 1,068
  13. 2024MLE-bench: Evaluating Machine Learning Agents on Machine Learning Engineeringcited by 429
  14. 2024Spider 2.0: Evaluating Language Models on Real-World Enterprise Text-to-SQL Workflowscited by 223
  15. 2024SocialBench: Sociality Evaluation of Role-Playing Conversational Agentscited by 48
  16. 2025DABstep: Data Agent Benchmark for Multi-step Reasoningcited by 44
  17. 2024AgentSense: Benchmarking Social Intelligence of Language Agents through Interactive Scenarioscited by 37
  18. 2021A Training-free and Reference-free Summarization Evaluation Metric via Centrality-weighted Relevance and Self-referenced Redundancycited by 21
  19. 2024A User-Centric Multi-Intent Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Modelscited by 15
  20. 2025OPT-BENCH: Evaluating LLM Agent on Large-Scale Search Spaces Optimization Problemscited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026COINBench: Moving Beyond Individual Perspectives to Collective Intent Understanding
  2. 2025SWI: Speaking with Intent in Large Language Models
  3. 2025MotiveBench: How Far Are We From Human-Like Motivational Reasoning in Large Language Models?
  4. 2025ConDABench: Interactive Evaluation of Language Models for Data Analysis
  5. 2026Sell More, Play Less: Benchmarking LLM Realistic Selling Skill
  6. 2026EComStage: Stage-wise and Orientation-specific Benchmarking for Large Language Models in E-commerce
  7. 2026Beyond Ideal Instruction: A Comprehensive Framework for Evaluating LLMs in Realistic Interactions
  8. 2023Understanding Social Reasoning in Language Models with Language Models