Teaching Language Models to Faithfully Express their Uncertainty
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models (LLMs) often miscommunicate their uncertainty: repeated queries can produce divergent answers, yet generated responses are typically unhedged or hedged in ways that do not reflect this variability. This conveys unfaithful information about the uncertain state of the LLMs' knowledge, creating a faithfulness gap that affects even strong LLMs. We introduce Faithful Uncertainty Tuning (FUT): a fine-tuning approach that teaches instruction-tuned LLMs to express uncertainty faithfully without altering their underlying answer distribution. We construct training data by augmenting model samples with uncertainty hedges (i.e. verbal cues such as 'possibly' or 'likely') aligned with sample consistency, requiring no supervision beyond the model and a set of prompts. We evaluate FUT on open-domain question answering (QA) across multiple models and datasets. Our results show that FUT substantially reduces the faithfulness gap, while preserving QA accuracy and introducing minimal semantic distribution shift. Further analyses demonstrate robustness across decoding strategies, choice of hedgers, and other forms of uncertainty expression (i.e. numerical). These findings establish FUT as a simple and effective way to teach LLMs to communicate uncertainty faithfully.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Oct 2025.
Builds on
27 of 53 references.
References · 27
- 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,955
- 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,916
- 2020DeBERTa: Decoding-enhanced BERT with Disentangled Attentioncited by 2,181
- 2022Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Knowcited by 1,856
- 2022When Not to Trust Language Models: Investigating Effectiveness of Parametric and Non-Parametric Memoriescited by 1,128
- 2022Teaching Models to Express Their Uncertainty in Wordscited by 751
- 20218-bit Optimizers via Block-wise Quantizationcited by 403
- 2020AmbigQA: Answering Ambiguous Open-domain Questionscited by 390
- 2020Reducing conversational agents' overconfidence through linguistic calibrationcited by 210
- 2024What Large Language Models Know and What People Think They Knowcited by 110
- 2024SaySelf: Teaching LLMs to Express Confidence with Self-Reflective Rationalescited by 105
- 2024Can Large Language Models Faithfully Express Their Intrinsic Uncertainty in Words?cited by 87
15 more
- 2024On Verbalized Confidence Scores for LLMscited by 83
- 2024"I'm Not Sure, But...": Examining the Impact of Large Language Models' Uncertainty Expression on User Reliance and Trustcited by 67
- 2024Calibrating Large Language Models Using Their Generations Onlycited by 65
- 2024Factual Confidence of LLMs: on Reliability and Robustness of Current Estimatorscited by 61
- 2024Linguistic Calibration of Long-Form Generationscited by 60
- 2025Calibrating Verbal Uncertainty as a Linear Feature to Reduce Hallucinationscited by 48
- 2025ConfTuner: Training Large Language Models to Express Their Confidence Verballycited by 39
- 2025No Answer Needed: Predicting LLM Answer Accuracy from Question-Only Linear Probescited by 38
- 2024Finetuning Language Models to Emit Linguistic Expressions of Uncertaintycited by 26
- 2024Enhancing Confidence Expression in Large Language Models Through Learning from Past Experiencecited by 21
- 2025MetaFaith: Faithful Natural Language Uncertainty Expression in LLMscited by 16
- 2025Anthropomimetic Uncertainty: What Verbalized Uncertainty in Language Models is Missingcited by 14
- 2025Self-Training Large Language Models with Confident Reasoningcited by 8
- 2025Mind the Generation Process: Fine-Grained Confidence Estimation During LLM Generationcited by 6
- 2025Black-Box Hallucination Detection via Consistency Under the Uncertain Expressioncited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 7.
7 papers.
- 2026Hallucinations Undermine Trust; Metacognition is a Way Forwardcited by 5
- 2026Reinforcement Learning with Metacognitive Feedback Elicits Faithful Uncertainty Expression in LLMscited by 4
- 2026Can LLMs Use Linguistic Uncertainty Markers to Reliably Reflect Intrinsic Confidence?cited by 2
- 2026Quantifying Faithful Confidence Expression in Large Reasoning Modelscited by 2
- 2026Clarify, Abstain or Answer? Strategising in Conversation with Belief-Augmented Generationcited by 1
- 2026Consistent but Miscalibrated: Evaluating LLM Limitations for Risk Communication in Natural Languagecited by 0
- 2026A Tale of Two Error Categories: Exploring Concealed Trade-Offs in the Errors of Automated Judges in Evaluation of Uncertainty Quantifierscited by 0
- 2026A Tale of Two Error Categories: Exploring Concealed Trade-Offs in the Errors of Automated Judges in Evaluation of Uncertainty Quantifiers7 Oct 2026
- 2026Consistent but Miscalibrated: Evaluating LLM Limitations for Risk Communication in Natural Language4 Jul 2026
- 2026Reinforcement Learning with Metacognitive Feedback Elicits Faithful Uncertainty Expression in LLMs30 Jun 2026
- 2026Quantifying Faithful Confidence Expression in Large Reasoning Models2 Jun 2026
- 2026Can LLMs Use Linguistic Uncertainty Markers to Reliably Reflect Intrinsic Confidence?27 May 2026
- 2026Clarify, Abstain or Answer? Strategising in Conversation with Belief-Augmented Generation25 May 2026
- 2026Hallucinations Undermine Trust; Metacognition is a Way Forward2 May 2026