Mind the Generation Process: Fine-Grained Confidence Estimation During LLM Generation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
While large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance across diverse tasks, they fundamentally lack self-awareness and frequently exhibit overconfidence, assigning high confidence scores to incorrect predictions. Accurate confidence estimation is therefore critical for enhancing the trustworthiness and reliability of LLM-generated outputs. However, existing approaches suffer from coarse-grained scoring mechanisms that fail to provide fine-grained, continuous confidence estimates throughout the generation process. To address these limitations, we introduce FineCE, a novel confidence estimation method that delivers accurate, fine-grained confidence scores during text generation. Specifically, we first develop a comprehensive pipeline for constructing training data that effectively captures the underlying probabilistic distribution of LLM responses, and then train a model to predict confidence scores for arbitrary text sequences in a supervised manner. Furthermore, we propose a Backward Confidence Integration (BCI) strategy that leverages information from the subsequent text to enhance confidence estimation for the current sequence during inference. We also introduce three strategies for identifying optimal positions to perform confidence estimation within the generation process. Extensive experiments on multiple benchmark datasets demonstrate that FineCE consistently outperforms existing classical confidence estimation methods. Our code and all baselines used in the paper are available on GitHub.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Aug 2025.
Builds on
28 of 43 references.
References · 28
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
- 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,955
- 2018Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answeringcited by 2,164
- 2022Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Knowcited by 1,856
- 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,822
- 2023Can LLMs Express Their Uncertainty? An Empirical Evaluation of Confidence Elicitation in LLMscited by 974
- 2023Just Ask for Calibration: Strategies for Eliciting Calibrated Confidence Scores from Language Models Fine-Tuned with Human Feedbackcited by 812
- 2022Teaching Models to Express Their Uncertainty in Wordscited by 751
16 more
- 2022Leveraging Large Language Models for Multiple Choice Question Answeringcited by 203
- 2024The Effect of Sampling Temperature on Problem Solving in Large Language Modelscited by 170
- 2024LLM Critics Help Catch LLM Bugscited by 147
- 2024To Believe or Not to Believe Your LLMcited by 120
- 2024The Good, The Bad, and The Greedy: Evaluation of LLMs Should Not Ignore Non-Determinismcited by 116
- 2024An Empirical Study of LLM-as-a-Judge for LLM Evaluation: Fine-tuned Judge Model is not a General Substitute for GPT-4cited by 94
- 2023Navigating the Grey Area: How Expressions of Uncertainty and Overconfidence Affect Language Modelscited by 91
- 2024Can LLMs Learn from Previous Mistakes? Investigating LLMs' Errors to Boost for Reasoningcited by 69
- 2024SelfIE: Self-Interpretation of Large Language Model Embeddingscited by 67
- 2023CritiqueLLM: Towards an Informative Critique Generation Model for Evaluation of Large Language Model Generationcited by 66
- 2024Learning Planning-based Reasoning by Trajectories Collection and Process Reward Synthesizingcited by 49
- 2024Calibrating the Confidence of Large Language Models by Eliciting Fidelitycited by 47
- 2024Fact-and-Reflection (FaR) Improves Confidence Calibration of Large Language Modelscited by 27
- 2024Neuro-Symbolic Data Generation for Math Reasoningcited by 22
- 2024Learning From Correctness Without Prompting Makes LLM Efficient Reasonercited by 15
- 2025Latent Convergence Modulation in Large Language Models: A Novel Approach to Iterative Contextual Realignmentcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 4.
6 papers.
- 2025Teaching Language Models to Faithfully Express their Uncertaintycited by 7
- 2025Self-Evaluating LLMs for Multi-Step Tasks: Stepwise Confidence Estimation for Failure Detectioncited by 6
- 2026Diagnosing Multi-step Reasoning Failures in Black-box LLMs via Stepwise Confidence Attributioncited by 2
- 2026Inference Time Optimization with Confidence Dynamicscited by 2
- 2026When Models Know When They Do Not Know: Calibration, Cascading, and Cleaningcited by 0
- 2026LUMOS: Tracing Parametric Knowledge from Training Data to Behavioral Outputs in LLMscited by 0
- 2026LUMOS: Tracing Parametric Knowledge from Training Data to Behavioral Outputs in LLMs2 Oct 2026
- 2026Inference Time Optimization with Confidence Dynamics24 May 2026
- 2026Diagnosing Multi-step Reasoning Failures in Black-box LLMs via Stepwise Confidence Attribution19 May 2026
- 2026When Models Know When They Do Not Know: Calibration, Cascading, and Cleaning12 Jan 2026
- 2025Self-Evaluating LLMs for Multi-Step Tasks: Stepwise Confidence Estimation for Failure Detection10 Nov 2025
- 2025Teaching Language Models to Faithfully Express their Uncertainty14 Oct 2025