mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Tokenization Disparities as Infrastructure Bias: How Subword Systems Create Inequities in LLM Access and Efficiency

arXiv 2510.12389 ↗First posted 14 Oct 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Tokenization disparities pose a significant barrier to achieving equitable access to artificial intelligence across linguistically diverse populations. This study conducts a large-scale cross-linguistic evaluation of tokenization efficiency in over 200 languages to systematically quantify computational inequities in large language models (LLMs). Using a standardized experimental framework, we applied consistent preprocessing and normalization protocols, followed by uniform tokenization through the tiktoken library across all language samples. Comprehensive tokenization statistics were collected using established evaluation metrics, including Tokens Per Sentence (TPS) and Relative Tokenization Cost (RTC), benchmarked against English baselines. Our cross-linguistic analysis reveals substantial and systematic disparities: Latin-script languages consistently exhibit higher tokenization efficiency, while non-Latin and morphologically complex languages incur significantly greater token inflation, often 3-5 times higher RTC ratios. These inefficiencies translate into increased computational costs and reduced effective context utilization for underrepresented languages. Overall, the findings highlight structural inequities in current AI systems, where speakers of low-resource and non-Latin languages face disproportionate computational disadvantages. Future research should prioritize the development of linguistically informed tokenization strategies and adaptive vocabulary construction methods that incorporate typological diversity, ensuring more inclusive and computationally equitable multilingual AI systems.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Oct 2025.

Builds on

18 of 26 references.

References · 18

  1. 2015Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Unitscited by 2,918
  2. 2018SentencePiece: A simple and language independent subword tokenizer and detokenizer for Neural Text Processingcited by 1,989
  3. 2022No Language Left Behind: Scaling Human-Centered Machine Translationcited by 1,312
  4. 2023Language Model Tokenizers Introduce Unfairness Between Languagescited by 214
  5. 2023Do All Languages Cost the Same? Tokenization in the Era of Commercial Language Modelscited by 192
  6. 2021Between words and characters: A Brief History of Open-Vocabulary Modeling and Tokenization in NLPcited by 132
  7. 2020Low-resource Languages: A Review of Past Work and Future Challengescited by 91
  8. 2020Fast WordPiece Tokenizationcited by 87
  9. 2024A Survey on Multilingual Large Language Models: Corpora, Alignment, and Biascited by 84
  10. 2022Impact of Tokenization on Language Models: An Analysis for Turkishcited by 62
  11. 2023Tokenization Impacts Multilingual Language Modeling: Assessing Vocabulary Allocation and Overlap Across Languagescited by 62
  12. 2024Trans-Tokenization and Cross-lingual Vocabulary Transfers: Language Adaptation of LLMs for Low-Resource NLPcited by 36
6 more
  1. 2024MAGNET: Improving the Multilingual Fairness of Language Models with Adaptive Gradient-Based Tokenizationcited by 31
  2. 2021Are Multilingual Models the Best Choice for Moderately Under-resourced Languages? A Comprehensive Assessment for Catalancited by 26
  3. 2021Allocating Large Vocabulary Capacity for Cross-lingual Language Model Pre-trainingcited by 22
  4. 2023Representativeness as a Forgotten Lesson for Multilingual and Code-switched Data Collection and Preparationcited by 16
  5. 2019On the Importance of Subword Information for Morphological Tasks in Truly Low-Resource Languagescited by 11
  6. 2023An Information Extraction Study: Take In Mind the Tokenization!cited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.