mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Tokenization with Split Trees

arXiv 2605.22705 ↗First posted 21 May 2026cs.CLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce Tokenization with Split Trees (ToaST), a subword tokenization method that directly optimizes compression under a new recursive inference procedure. ToaST greedily splits each pretoken into a full binary tree using precomputed byte n-gram counts, independent of any vocabulary. Given a vocabulary, inference recursively descends each split tree and emits the first in-vocabulary node reached on each path. Vocabulary selection is formulated as an Integer Program (IP) that minimizes the total token count over all split trees under this inference procedure. The Linear Programming (LP) relaxation is near-integral in practice, yielding provably near-optimal vocabularies, with training time empirically scaling quadratically in the number of split trees. On English text, ToaST reduces token counts by more than 11% compared to BPE, WordPiece, and UnigramLM at vocabulary sizes of 40,960 and above, reducing the number of inference tokens for models using this tokenizer, thus extending the effective context length. ToaST also uses common single-byte tokens less frequently than these baselines, leading to a substantial improvement in Renyi efficiency. In experiments training 1.5B parameter language models, ToaST achieves the highest CORE score, outperforming baselines by 2.6%--7.6%, with significance for two of three, and scoring best on 13 of 22 individual tasks.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 May 2026.

Builds on

32 of 50 references.

References · 32

  1. 2016Google's Neural Machine Translation System: Bridging the Gap between Human and Machine Translationcited by 1,471
  2. 2015Improving Neural Machine Translation Models with Monolingual Datacited by 784
  3. 2018Subword Regularization: Improving Neural Network Translation Models with Multiple Subword Candidatescited by 632
  4. 2024DataComp-LM: In search of the next generation of training sets for language modelscited by 381
  5. 2020How Good is Your Tokenizer? On the Monolingual Performance of Multilingual Language Modelscited by 313
  6. 2020Byte Pair Encoding is Suboptimal for Language Model Pretrainingcited by 189
  7. 2023Do All Languages Cost the Same? Tokenization in the Era of Commercial Language Modelscited by 186
  8. 2023CulturaX: A Cleaned, Enormous, and Multilingual Dataset for Large Language Models in 167 Languagescited by 172
  9. 2024Tokenization Is More Than Compressioncited by 87
  10. 2015Parallelizing the dual revised simplex methodcited by 83
  11. 2024Getting the most out of your tokenizer for pre-training and domain adaptationcited by 65
  12. 2021Superbizarre Is Not Superb: Derivational Morphology Improves BERT's Interpretation of Complex Wordscited by 63
20 more
  1. 2025Nemotron-CLIMB: CLustering-based Iterative Data Mixture Bootstrapping for Language Model Pre-trainingcited by 62
  2. 2024Unpacking Tokenization: Evaluating Text Compression and its Correlation with Model Performancecited by 61
  3. 2023Tokenization and the Noiseless Channelcited by 58
  4. 2025SuperBPE: Space Travel for Language Modelscited by 58
  5. 2024MYTE: Morphology-Driven Byte Encoding for Better and Fairer Multilingual Language Modelingcited by 40
  6. 2020Morphology Matters: A Multilingual Language Modeling Analysiscited by 37
  7. 2024Greed is All You Need: An Evaluation of Tokenizer Inference Methodscited by 34
  8. 2025Boundless Byte Pair Encoding: Breaking the Pre-tokenization Barriercited by 31
  9. 2024A Bit of a Problem: Measurement Disparities in Dataset Sizes Across Languagescited by 22
  10. 2025Parity-Aware Byte-Pair Encoding: Improving Cross-lingual Fairness in Tokenizationcited by 18
  11. 2025How Much is Enough? The Diminishing Returns of Tokenization Training Datacited by 15
  12. 2025The Token Tax: Systematic Bias in Multilingual Tokenizationcited by 13
  13. 2018Compositional Representation of Morphologically-Rich Input for Neural Machine Translationcited by 12
  14. 2025BPE Stays on SCRIPT: Structured Encoding for Robust Multilingual Pretokenizationcited by 11
  15. 2024Tokenisation is NP-Completecited by 10
  16. 2024Improbable Bigrams Expose Vulnerabilities of Incomplete Tokens in Byte-Level Tokenizerscited by 7
  17. 2025A Partition Cover Approach to Tokenizationcited by 5
  18. 2025Tokenisation over Bounded Alphabets is Hardcited by 5
  19. 2026The Script Tax: Measuring Tokenization-Driven Efficiency and Latency Disparities in Multilingual Language Modelscited by 3
  20. 2025Tokenization Disparities as Infrastructure Bias: How Subword Systems Create Inequities in LLM Access and Efficiencycited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.