From <Answer> to <Think>: Multidimensional Supervision of Reasoning Process for LLM Optimization
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reinforcement learning for reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Improving the multi-step reasoning ability of Large Language Models (LLMs) is a critical yet challenging task. The dominant paradigm, outcome-supervised reinforcement learning (RLVR), rewards only correct final answers, often propagating flawed reasoning and suffering from sparse reward signals. While process-level reward models (PRMs) provide denser, step-by-step feedback, they lack generalizability and interpretability, requiring task-specific segmentation of the reasoning process. To this end, we propose the Dimension-level Reward Model (DRM), a new supervision framework that bridges the gap between these two approaches. DRM evaluates the quality of a reasoning process along three fundamental, complementary, and interpretable dimensions: Confidence for uncertainty calibration, Relevance for semantic alignment, and Coherence for logical consistency. Together, these dimensions capture aspects beyond final answer correctness and enable interpretable assessment without requiring ground truth answers. Experimental results show that DRM provides effective supervision signals, guides the optimization of LLMs and enhances their reasoning ability. In particular, DRM-supervised training achieves consistent gains on both in-distribution and out-of-distribution open-domain tasks, including mathematics, question answering, code execution, and puzzles. Our findings demonstrate that multidimensional supervision of the reasoning process can improve the generalized reasoning ability of LLMs beyond the training distribution.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 8 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2025.
Builds on
8 of 59 references.
References · 8
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2024Qwen2 Technical Reportcited by 2,120
- 2025Qwen3 Embedding: Advancing Text Embedding and Reranking Through Foundation Modelscited by 1,261
- 2024CRUXEval: A Benchmark for Code Reasoning, Understanding and Executioncited by 300
- 2019QASC: A Dataset for Question Answering via Sentence Compositioncited by 252
- 2024FlashRAG: A Modular Toolkit for Efficient Retrieval-Augmented Generation Researchcited by 166
- 2025HelpSteer3-Preference: Open Human-Annotated Preference Data across Diverse Tasks and Languagescited by 75
- 2025PiCSAR: Probabilistic Confidence Selection And Ranking for Reasoning Chainscited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
- 2026Guided by Trajectories: Repairing and Rewarding Tool-Use Trajectories for Tool-Integrated Reasoningcited by 2
- 2026VeriBound: PAC-Bayesian Generalization Bounds for Process Reward Models Trained with Formal Verification Toolscited by 1
- 2026HoloGeo: Mitigating Landmark Bias in Geo-localization via Evidence-Driven Reasoningcited by 1
- 2026HoloGeo: Mitigating Landmark Bias in Geo-localization via Evidence-Driven Reasoning16 Jul 2026
- 2026VeriBound: PAC-Bayesian Generalization Bounds for Process Reward Models Trained with Formal Verification Tools17 Jun 2026
- 2026Guided by Trajectories: Repairing and Rewarding Tool-Use Trajectories for Tool-Integrated Reasoning30 Jan 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2023Let's reward step by step: Step-Level reward model as the Navigators for Reasoning
- 2025Linking Process to Outcome: Conditional Reward Modeling for LLM Reasoning
- 2024Rewarding Progress: Scaling Automated Process Verifiers for LLM Reasoning
- 2026LLM Reasoning with Process Rewards for Outcome-Guided Steps
- 2025Towards Hierarchical Multi-Step Reward Models for Enhanced Reasoning in Large Language Models
- 2025Enhancing Large Language Model Reasoning with Reward Models: An Analytical Survey
- 2025Rectifying LLM Thought from Lens of Optimization
- 2024On Designing Effective RL Reward at Training Time for LLM Reasoning