mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Q-Learning with Shift-Aware Upper Confidence Bound in Non-Stationary Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2510.03181 ↗First posted 3 Oct 2025cs.LGcited by 1

On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → RL theory and sample complexity

Abstract (arXiv)

We study the Non-Stationary Reinforcement Learning (RL) under distribution shifts in both finite-horizon episodic and infinite-horizon discounted Markov Decision Processes (MDPs). In the finite-horizon case, the transition functions may suddenly change at a particular episode. In the infinite-horizon setting, such changes can occur at an arbitrary time step during the agent's interaction with the environment. While the Q-learning Upper Confidence Bound algorithm (QUCB) can discover a proper policy during learning, due to the distribution shifts, this policy can exploit sub-optimal rewards after the shift happens. To address this issue, we propose Density-QUCB (DQUCB), a shift-aware Q-learning UCB algorithm, which uses a transition density function to detect distribution shifts, then leverages its likelihood to enhance the uncertainty estimation quality of Q-learning UCB, resulting in a balance between exploration and exploitation. Theoretically, we prove that our oracle DQUCB achieves a better regret guarantee than QUCB. Empirically, our DQUCB enjoys the computational efficiency of model-free RL and outperforms QUCB baselines by having a lower regret across RL tasks, as well as a COVID-19 patient hospital allocation task using a Deep-Q-learning architecture.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in RL theory and sample complexity, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. Builds on 22 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Oct 2025.

Builds on

22 of 52 references.

References · 22

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  2. 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,274
  3. 2017Minimax Regret Bounds for Reinforcement Learningcited by 503
  4. 2018Is Q-learning Provably Efficient?cited by 487
  5. 2016#Exploration: A Study of Count-Based Exploration for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 309
  6. 2020Nearly Minimax Optimal Reinforcement Learning for Linear Mixture Markov Decision Processescited by 200
  7. 2020Reinforcement Learning for Non-Stationary Markov Decision Processes: The Blessing of (More) Optimismcited by 76
  8. 2019Discretizing Continuous Action Space for On-Policy Optimizationcited by 68
  9. 2014Algorithms for multi-armed bandit problemscited by 64
  10. 2020Q-learning with Logarithmic Regretcited by 60
  11. 2019Q-learning with UCB Exploration is Sample Efficient for Infinite-Horizon MDPcited by 55
  12. 2021UCB Momentum Q-learning: Correcting the bias without forgettingcited by 46
10 more
  1. 2023Variance-Dependent Regret Bounds for Linear Bandits and Reinforcement Learning: Adaptivity and Computational Efficiencycited by 40
  2. 2018A Sliding-Window Algorithm for Markov Decision Processes with Arbitrarily Changing Rewards and Transitionscited by 30
  3. 2020Tightening Exploration in Upper Confidence Reinforcement Learningcited by 25
  4. 2019The Optimal Approximation Factor in Density Estimationcited by 12
  5. 2023Density-Softmax: Efficient Test-time Model for Uncertainty Estimation and Robustness under Distribution Shiftscited by 12
  6. 2021Combinatorial Multi-armed Bandits for Resource Allocationcited by 10
  7. 2021Online Calibrated and Conformal Prediction Improves Bayesian Optimizationcited by 10
  8. 2014Near-Optimal Density Estimation in Near-Linear Time Using Variable-Width Histogramscited by 9
  9. 2024Density-Regression: Efficient and Distance-Aware Deep Regressor for Uncertainty Estimation under Distribution Shiftscited by 7
  10. 2024Variance-Aware Linear UCB with Deep Representation for Neural Contextual Banditscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026ReversedQ: Opportunities for Faster Q-Learning in Episodic Online Reinforcement Learning
  2. 2026DARLING: Detection Augmented Reinforcement Learning with Non-Stationary Guarantees
  3. 2024Q-Distribution guided Q-learning for offline reinforcement learning: Uncertainty penalized Q-value via consistency model
  4. 2026Long-Horizon Q-Learning: Accurate Value Learning via n-Step Inequalities
  5. 2022Pessimistic Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learning: Towards Optimal Sample Complexity
  6. 2024ACL-QL: Adaptive Conservative Level in Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learning
  7. 2025Q-learning with Posterior Sampling
  8. 2025Provably Efficient and Agile Randomized Q-Learning