mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ReversedQ: Opportunities for Faster Q-Learning in Episodic Online Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2605.20592 ↗First posted 20 May 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study model-free Q-learning in finite-horizon episodic Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) with stationary dynamics across episodes. We identify a central issue in nascent model-free posterior-sampling works: the reliance on delayed learning in order to prove theoretical guarantees. In particular, we identify three opportunities for faster learning - (i) value-function update order, (ii) update frequencies, and (iii) value-function initialization. Using Wang et al.'s RandomizedQ as a basis, we illustrate these changes and their individual (as well as cumulative) impact in multiple empirical studies. We find that our combined modifications, termed ReversedQ, improve scaled mean cumulative reward compared to RandomizedQ, from 9.53% to 78.78% in the Bidirectional Diabolical Combination Lock (BDCL), and from 21.76% to 61.81% in a chain MDP.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 11 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 May 2026.

Builds on

8 of 11 references.

References · 8

  1. 2017Minimax Regret Bounds for Reinforcement Learningcited by 500
  2. 2018Is Q-learning Provably Efficient?cited by 485
  3. 2013(More) Efficient Reinforcement Learning via Posterior Samplingcited by 233
  4. 2016Why is Posterior Sampling Better than Optimism for Reinforcement Learning?cited by 116
  5. 2020PC-PG: Policy Cover Directed Exploration for Provable Policy Gradient Learningcited by 91
  6. 2023Model-free Posterior Sampling via Learning Rate Randomizationcited by 6
  7. 2024Comparative Analysis of Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Policies for Crop Planning Decision Supportcited by 3
  8. 2025Provably Efficient and Agile Randomized Q-Learningcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.