Stabilizing Policy Gradients for Sample-Efficient Reinforcement Learning in LLM Reasoning
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reinforcement learning for reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Reinforcement Learning, particularly through policy gradient methods, has played a central role in enabling reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models. However, the optimization stability of policy gradients in this setting remains understudied. As a result, existing implementations often resort to conservative hyperparameter choices to ensure stability, which requires more training samples and increases computational costs. Hence, developing models for reliably tracking the underlying optimization dynamics and leveraging them into training enables more sample-efficient regimes and further unleashes scalable post-training. We address this gap by formalizing the stochastic optimization problem of policy gradients with explicit consideration of second-order geometry. We propose a tractable computational framework that tracks and leverages curvature information during policy updates. We further employ this framework to design interventions in the optimization process through data selection. The resultant algorithm, Curvature-Aware Policy Optimization (CAPO), identifies samples that contribute to unstable updates and masks them out. Theoretically, we establish monotonic improvement guarantees under realistic assumptions. On standard math reasoning benchmarks, we empirically show that CAPO ensures stable updates under aggressive learning regimes where baselines catastrophically fail. With minimal intervention (rejecting fewer than 8% of tokens), CAPO achieves up to 30x improvement in sample efficiency over standard GRPO for LLM reasoning.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 28 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2025.
Builds on
28 of 64 references.
Closest ancestors · 11
Same direction, newest first
- 2025A Survey of Reinforcement Learning for Large Reasoning Models10 Sep
- 2025DCPO: Dynamic Clipping Policy Optimization2 Sep
- 2025The Entropy Mechanism of Reinforcement Learning for Reasoning Language Models28 May
- 2025Do Not Let Low-Probability Tokens Over-Dominate in RL for LLMs19 May
- 2025Understanding R1-Zero-Like Training: A Critical Perspective26 Mar
- 2025DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scale18 Mar
- 2025Cognitive Behaviors that Enable Self-Improving Reasoners, or, Four Habits of Highly Effective STaRs3 Mar
- 2025Kimi k1.5: Scaling Reinforcement Learning with LLMs22 Jan
- 2025REINFORCE++: Stabilizing Critic-Free Policy Optimization with Global Advantage Normalization4 Jan
- 2023Let's Verify Step by Step31 May
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms20 Jul
Other references · 17
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
- 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,713
- 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,655
- 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,748
- 2019HuggingFace's Transformers: State-of-the-art Natural Language Processingcited by 2,201
- 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,124
- 2024HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Frameworkcited by 1,980
- 2022Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language Modelscited by 1,359
- 2024OpenAI o1 System Cardcited by 1,220
- 2024Qwen2.5-Math Technical Report: Toward Mathematical Expert Model via Self-Improvementcited by 1,057
5 more
- 2025Scaling Test-Time Compute Without Verification or RL is Suboptimalcited by 82
- 2025Tapered Off-Policy REINFORCE: Stable and efficient reinforcement learning for LLMscited by 61
- 2025On a few pitfalls in KL divergence gradient estimation for RLcited by 27
- 2024Plasticity Loss in Deep Reinforcement Learning: A Surveycited by 24
- 2025Stable Gradients for Stable Learning at Scale in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 22
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.
5 papers.
- 2026LLMs Can Learn to Reason Via Off-Policy RLcited by 10
- 2026PAIR: Pairwise-Aware Inclusion Reweighting for Adaptive Rollout Allocation in RLVRcited by 1
- 2026Gradients Know What Outcomes Don't: Unlocking Reinforcement Learning for LLM Reasoning with Gradient-Aligned Rewardscited by 1
- 2026Gradient Extrapolation-Based Policy Optimizationcited by 0
- 2026Bridging Physical Reasoning and Task Generalization via Visual Action Outcome Reasoning Alignmentcited by 0
- 2026Gradients Know What Outcomes Don't: Unlocking Reinforcement Learning for LLM Reasoning with Gradient-Aligned Rewards3 Sep 2026
- 2026PAIR: Pairwise-Aware Inclusion Reweighting for Adaptive Rollout Allocation in RLVR11 Aug 2026
- 2026Bridging Physical Reasoning and Task Generalization via Visual Action Outcome Reasoning Alignment7 Jul 2026
- 2026Gradient Extrapolation-Based Policy Optimization7 May 2026
- 2026LLMs Can Learn to Reason Via Off-Policy RL22 Feb 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Slow-Fast Policy Optimization: Reposition-Before-Update for LLM Reasoning
- 2025Stabilizing Reinforcement Learning with LLMs: Formulation and Practices
- 2025Future Policy Approximation for Offline Reinforcement Learning in LLM Reasoning
- 2025COPO: Consistency-Aware Policy Optimization
- 2025Can LLMs Guide Their Own Exploration? Gradient-Guided Reinforcement Learning for LLM Reasoning
- 2025LSPO: Length-aware Dynamic Sampling for Policy Optimization in LLM Reasoning
- 2026STAPO: Stabilizing Reinforcement Learning for LLMs by Silencing Rare Spurious Tokens
- 2026How to Allocate, How to Learn? Dynamic Rollout Allocation and Advantage Modulation for Policy Optimization