Milco: Learned Sparse Retrieval Across Languages via a Multilingual Connector
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Learned Sparse Retrieval (LSR) combines the efficiency of bi-encoders with the transparency of lexical matching, but existing approaches struggle to scale beyond English. We introduce MILCO, an LSR architecture that maps queries and documents from different languages into a shared English lexical space via a multilingual connector. MILCO is trained with a specialized two-stage regime that combines Sparse Alignment Pretraining with contrastive training to provide representation transparency and effectiveness while mitigating semantic collapse. Motivated by the observation that uncommon entities are often lost when projected into English, we propose a new LexEcho head, which enhances robustness by augmenting the English lexical representation with a source-language view obtained through a special [ECHO] token. MILCO achieves state-of-the-art multilingual and cross-lingual LSR performance, outperforming leading dense, sparse, and multi-vector baselines such as BGE-M3 and Qwen3-Embed on standard multilingual benchmarks, while supporting dynamic efficiency through post-hoc pruning. Notably, when using mass-based pruning to reduce document representations to only 30 active dimensions on average, MILCO 560M outperforms the similarly-sized Qwen3-Embed 0.6B with 1024 dimensions, while achieving 3× lower retrieval latency and 10× smaller index size.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 51 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2025.
Builds on
51 of 67 references.
References · 51
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
- 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,662
- 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,115
- 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,907
- 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,686
- 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,895
- 2019HuggingFace's Transformers: State-of-the-art Natural Language Processingcited by 2,201
- 2016MS MARCO: A Human Generated MAchine Reading COmprehension Datasetcited by 1,591
- 2018FEVER: a large-scale dataset for Fact Extraction and VERificationcited by 1,362
- 2021BEIR: A Heterogenous Benchmark for Zero-shot Evaluation of Information Retrieval Modelscited by 1,225
- 2025Qwen3 Embedding: Advancing Text Embedding and Reranking Through Foundation Modelscited by 1,175
- 2024M3-Embedding: Multi-Linguality, Multi-Functionality, Multi-Granularity Text Embeddings Through Self-Knowledge Distillationcited by 1,050
38 more
- 2020Language-agnostic BERT Sentence Embeddingcited by 621
- 2020Making Monolingual Sentence Embeddings Multilingual using Knowledge Distillationcited by 591
- 2019ELI5: Long Form Question Answeringcited by 567
- 2020SPECTER: Document-level Representation Learning using Citation-informed Transformerscited by 426
- 2024Multilingual E5 Text Embeddings: A Technical Reportcited by 357
- 2023Improving Text Embeddings with Large Language Modelscited by 295
- 2021SPLADE: Sparse Lexical and Expansion Model for First Stage Rankingcited by 283
- 2022Matryoshka Representation Learningcited by 268
- 2020InfoXLM: An Information-Theoretic Framework for Cross-Lingual Language Model Pre-Trainingcited by 237
- 2020MKQA: A Linguistically Diverse Benchmark for Multilingual Open Domain Question Answeringcited by 151
- 2025MMTEB: Massive Multilingual Text Embedding Benchmarkcited by 120
- 2021Mr. TyDi: A Multi-lingual Benchmark for Dense Retrievalcited by 118
- 2021mMARCO: A Multilingual Version of the MS MARCO Passage Ranking Datasetcited by 116
- 2017DuReader: a Chinese Machine Reading Comprehension Dataset from Real-world Applicationscited by 110
- 2022From Distillation to Hard Negative Sampling: Making Sparse Neural IR Models More Effectivecited by 98
- 2025On the Theoretical Limitations of Embedding-Based Retrievalcited by 98
- 2024Making Text Embedders Few-Shot Learnerscited by 78
- 2021A Few Brief Notes on DeepImpact, COIL, and a Conceptual Framework for Information Retrieval Techniquescited by 69
- 2023T2Ranking: A large-scale Chinese Benchmark for Passage Rankingcited by 59
- 2019Translationese as a Language in "Multilingual" NMTcited by 36
- 2022Transfer Learning Approaches for Building Cross-Language Dense Retrieval Modelscited by 36
- 2020Expansion via Prediction of Importance with Contextualizationcited by 26
- 2022Towards Best Practices for Training Multilingual Dense Retrieval Modelscited by 26
- 2025Beyond Matryoshka: Revisiting Sparse Coding for Adaptive Representationcited by 25
- 2024Efficient Inverted Indexes for Approximate Retrieval over Learned Sparse Representationscited by 23
- 2024Translate-Distill: Learning Cross-Language Dense Retrieval by Translation and Distillationcited by 22
- 2023A Unified Framework for Learned Sparse Retrievalcited by 17
- 2024Overview of the TREC 2023 NeuCLIR Trackcited by 17
- 2022C3: Continued Pretraining with Contrastive Weak Supervision for Cross Language Ad-Hoc Retrievalcited by 14
- 2024Multimodal Learned Sparse Retrieval with Probabilistic Expansion Controlcited by 12
- 2023EmbedDistill: A Geometric Knowledge Distillation for Information Retrievalcited by 11
- 2024ColBERT-XM: A Modular Multi-Vector Representation Model for Zero-Shot Multilingual Information Retrievalcited by 7
- 2025Enhancing Lexicon-Based Text Embeddings with Large Language Modelscited by 6
- 2023Quick Dense Retrievers Consume KALE: Post Training Kullback Leibler Alignment of Embeddings for Asymmetrical dual encoderscited by 5
- 2025Effective Inference-Free Retrieval for Learned Sparse Representationscited by 5
- 2024Tomato, Tomahto, Tomate: Do Multilingual Language Models Understand Based on Subword-Level Semantic Concepts?cited by 4
- 2023Extending English IR methods to multi-lingual IRcited by 3
- 2024Distillation for Multilingual Information Retrievalcited by 3
50 most cited of 51 All 51 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 9.
9 papers.
- 2026LACONIC: Dense-Level Effectiveness for Scalable Sparse Retrieval via a Two-Phase Training Curriculumcited by 5
- 2026Incorporating Q&A Nuggets into Retrieval-Augmented Generationcited by 2
- 2026LANCER: LLM Reranking for Nugget Coveragecited by 2
- 2026On the Challenges and Opportunities of Learned Sparse Retrieval for Codecited by 2
- 2026RoutIR: Fast Serving of Retrieval Pipelines for Retrieval-Augmented Generationcited by 1
- 2026Insider Knowledge: How Much Can RAG Systems Gain from Evaluation Secrets?cited by 1
- 2026Beyond Relevance: On the Relationship Between Retrieval and RAG Information Coveragecited by 1
- 2026The Multilingual Curse at the Retrieval Layer: Evidence from Amhariccited by 0
- 2026Why Advanced Encoders Lag on Sparse Retrieval? The Answer and an Approach to Bridging Vocabulary Gapscited by 0
- 2026The Multilingual Curse at the Retrieval Layer: Evidence from Amharic23 May 2026
- 2026Why Advanced Encoders Lag on Sparse Retrieval? The Answer and an Approach to Bridging Vocabulary Gaps20 Apr 2026
- 2026On the Challenges and Opportunities of Learned Sparse Retrieval for Code23 Mar 2026
- 2026Beyond Relevance: On the Relationship Between Retrieval and RAG Information Coverage9 Mar 2026
- 2026LANCER: LLM Reranking for Nugget Coverage29 Jan 2026
- 2026Insider Knowledge: How Much Can RAG Systems Gain from Evaluation Secrets?19 Jan 2026
- 2026Incorporating Q&A Nuggets into Retrieval-Augmented Generation19 Jan 2026
- 2026RoutIR: Fast Serving of Retrieval Pipelines for Retrieval-Augmented Generation15 Jan 2026
- 2026LACONIC: Dense-Level Effectiveness for Scalable Sparse Retrieval via a Two-Phase Training Curriculum4 Jan 2026