Overthink-Triggered Slowdown Attacks on LVLM-Based Robotic Systems
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning for agents, planning and code
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have been increasingly integrated into robotic systems. However, these models may exhibit overthinking behaviors, where they generate excessively long reasoning traces, incurring an excessive inference time. This overthinking behavior poses a serious risk to robotic systems, as the adversary can deliberately trigger overthinking to slow down the decision making of a victim robotic system, causing a variety of safety issues (i.e., an overthinking-induced slowdown attack). To initiate this attack, an adversary can embed carefully crafted, human-readable scene text into the visual scene observed by a victim robotic agent, causing significant inference delays even under a strict black-box setting. Therefore, the embedded scene text serves as a significant "trigger" for the attack. This work systematically identifies and validates transferable triggers of overthinking in robotic systems by introducing a three-stage framework. First, we construct a diverse corpus of reasoning-intensive scene text and extract overthinking-correlated lexical features from short response prefixes. Second, we perform an efficient black-box search guided by a prefix-based proxy score while selectively confirming a small set of top candidates with full latency measurements. Third, we evaluate black-box transfer using a fixed pool of triggers on unseen images and multiple LVLMs, reporting latency amplification and attack success rates under standard thresholds. Across three representative LVLMs, all triggers yield slowdown ratios greater than 1.0x, with the strongest single-trigger case reaching 6.96x. The physical printing of the text trigger still causes up to 4.74x latency amplification. These results demonstrate that our discovered triggers are transferred between multiple LVLM models and consistently cause significant slowdowns in robotic systems.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 21 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jul 2026.
Builds on
21 of 35 references.
Closest ancestors · 6
Same direction, newest first
- 2025ThinkTrap: Denial-of-Service Attacks against Black-box LLM Services via Infinite Thinking8 Dec
- 2025BadThink: Triggered Overthinking Attacks on Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Large Language Models13 Nov
- 2025Distractor Injection Attacks on Large Reasoning Models: Characterization and Defense17 Oct
- 2025BadReasoner: Planting Tunable Overthinking Backdoors into Large Reasoning Models for Fun or Profit24 Jul
- 2025Excessive Reasoning Attack on Reasoning LLMs17 Jun
- 2025OverThink: Slowdown Attacks on Reasoning LLMs4 Feb
Other references · 15
- 2024Do NOT Think That Much for 2+3=? On the Overthinking of o1-Like LLMscited by 564
- 2024Inducing High Energy-Latency of Large Vision-Language Models with Verbose Imagescited by 69
- 2024Multi-Frame, Lightweight & Efficient Vision-Language Models for Question Answering in Autonomous Drivingcited by 52
- 2025ThinkSwitcher: When to Think Hard, When to Think Fastcited by 37
- 2024Vision-LLMs Can Fool Themselves with Self-Generated Typographic Attackscited by 36
- 2024Denial-of-Service Poisoning Attacks against Large Language Modelscited by 34
- 2024On-Board Vision-Language Models for Personalized Autonomous Vehicle Motion Control: System Design and Real-World Validationcited by 15
- 2026Beyond Max Tokens: Stealthy Resource Amplification via Tool Calling Chains in LLM Agentscited by 14
- 2025LAPO: Internalizing Reasoning Efficiency via Length-Adaptive Policy Optimizationcited by 11
- 2025ExtendAttack: Attacking Servers of LRMs via Extending Reasoningcited by 10
- 2025CHAI: Command Hijacking against embodied AIcited by 9
- 2025DNR Bench: Benchmarking Over-Reasoning in Reasoning LLMscited by 7
3 more
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Hijacking Robots with a Piece of Paper: A Systematic Study of Physical Prompt Injection in VLM-Controlled Robots
- 2024Exploring the Adversarial Vulnerabilities of Vision-Language-Action Models in Robotics
- 2026Vision-Language-Action Safety: Threats, Challenges, Evaluations, and Mechanisms
- 2026Overthinking Causes Hallucination: Tracing Confounder Propagation in Vision Language Models
- 2026TrustVLA: Mechanism-Guided Inference-Time Defense Against Vision-Language-Action Backdoors
- 2026Altered Thoughts, Altered Actions: Probing Chain-of-Thought Vulnerabilities in VLA Robotic Manipulation
- 2026Partially Observable Adversarial Patch Attacks on Vision-Language-Action Models in Robotics
- 2026Seeing vs. Believing: Evaluating the Language Bias of Open-Source MLLMs in Counter-Intuitive Scenes