RoboJailBench: Benchmarking Adversarial Attacks and Defenses in Embodied Robotic Agents
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → MLLM jailbreaks and adversarial robustness
also in 2 more
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent advances in Vision-Language Models (VLMs) facilitate a new class of embodied AI systems, where these models are integrated into physical platforms, e.g. robots and autonomous vehicles, to interpret visual scenes and execute natural language commands in diverse environments. Previous research has introduced jailbreak attacks and defenses for embodied AI. Their evaluations, however, rely on ad-hoc datasets, limited metrics, and emphasize attack success while neglecting the trade-off between security and the ability to follow benign commands. Existing benchmarks and evaluation frameworks either target traditional chat-based models or focus on non-adversarial safety evaluation for embodied AI; neither captures the adversarial risks, inputs, consequences, and evaluation criteria necessary for jailbreak attacks in embodied AI systems. In this paper, we address this gap with RoboJailBench, which consists of three core components. We establish a security taxonomy derived from ISO standards, regulatory rules, and documented incidents. This effort yields 18 categories of security violation consequences for embodied AI. We introduce an intent contrast dataset pipeline that augments existing datasets with paired adversarial and benign goals to measure both security and utility. Lastly, we provide an evolving repository with standardized metrics and a unified process for assessing and integrating new attacks and defenses. With this benchmark, we construct a new taxonomy-balanced dataset and augment five existing datasets. We integrate four attacks and two defenses to evaluate their performance on leading embodied VLMs. This benchmark provides the first standardized evaluation framework for jailbreak attacks in embodied AI and supports future research. We release our code, datasets, and artifacts, and maintain a leaderboard at https://purseclab.github.io/benchmark-for-robotics-security.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in MLLM jailbreaks and adversarial robustness, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 16 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 May 2026.
Builds on
16 of 25 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 15
- 2024HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust Refusalcited by 1,429
- 2024JailbreakBench: An Open Robustness Benchmark for Jailbreaking Large Language Modelscited by 536
- 2024AgentHarm: A Benchmark for Measuring Harmfulness of LLM Agentscited by 437
- 2023Multilingual Jailbreak Challenges in Large Language Modelscited by 240
- 2024SafeAgentBench: A Benchmark for Safe Task Planning of Embodied LLM Agentscited by 116
- 2021RobustNav: Towards Benchmarking Robustness in Embodied Navigationcited by 54
- 2024BadRobot: Jailbreaking Embodied LLM Agents in the Physical Worldcited by 43
- 2025Robo2VLM: Visual Question Answering from Large-Scale In-the-Wild Robot Manipulation Datasetscited by 40
- 2025Safety Guardrails for LLM-Enabled Robotscited by 35
- 2025Generating Robot Constitutions & Benchmarks for Semantic Safetycited by 33
- 2024EARBench: Towards Evaluating Physical Risk Awareness for Task Planning of Foundation Model-based Embodied AI Agentscited by 27
- 2025Subtle Risks, Critical Failures: A Framework for Diagnosing Physical Safety of LLMs for Embodied Decision Makingcited by 20
3 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Towards Robust and Secure Embodied AI: A Survey on Vulnerabilities and Attacks
- 2025ANNIE: Be Careful of Your Robots
- 2026Security of Foundation-Model-Powered Embodied Agents: Attack Surfaces, Attacks, Defenses, and Evaluation
- 2026Safety in Embodied AI: A Survey of Risks, Attacks, and Defenses
- 2025CHAI: Command Hijacking against embodied AI
- 2025Advancing Embodied Agent Security: From Safety Benchmarks to Input Moderation
- 2026Jailbreaking Embodied LLMs via Action-level Manipulation
- 2024Can We Trust Embodied Agents? Exploring Backdoor Attacks against Embodied LLM-based Decision-Making Systems