Branching Out: Broadening AI Measurement and Evaluation with Measurement Trees
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper introduces textitmeasurement trees, a novel class of metrics designed to combine various constructs into an interpretable multi-level representation of a measurand. Unlike conventional metrics that yield single values, vectors, surfaces, or categories, measurement trees produce a hierarchical directed graph in which each node summarizes its children through user-defined aggregation methods. In response to recent calls to expand the scope of AI system evaluation, measurement trees enhance metric transparency and facilitate the integration of heterogeneous evidence, including, e.g., agentic, business, energy-efficiency, sociotechnical, or security signals. We present definitions and examples, demonstrate practical utility through a large-scale measurement exercise, and provide accompanying open-source Python code. By operationalizing a transparent approach to measurement of complex constructs, this work offers a principled foundation for broader and more interpretable AI evaluation.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Sep 2025.
Builds on
3 of 22 references.
References · 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Litmus: Zero-Label, Code-Driven Metric Specification for Evaluating AI Systems
- 2025Measurement to Meaning: A Validity-Centered Framework for AI Evaluation
- 2025General Scales Unlock AI Evaluation with Explanatory and Predictive Power
- 2026Towards More Standardized AI Evaluation: From Models to Agents
- 2023Fair Feature Importance Scores for Interpreting Tree-Based Methods and Surrogates
- 2024Measuring Error Alignment for Decision-Making Systems
- 2025GEMMAS: Graph-based Evaluation Metrics for Multi Agent Systems
- 2026Measurement Without Validity: The Compounding Reliability Problem in Agentic AI Evaluation