The Loss Kernel: A Geometric Probe for Deep Learning Interpretability
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We introduce the loss kernel, an interpretability method for measuring similarity between data points according to a trained neural network. The kernel is the covariance matrix of per-sample losses computed under a distribution of low-loss-preserving parameter perturbations. We first validate our method on a synthetic multitask problem, showing it separates inputs by task as predicted by theory. We then apply this kernel to Inception-v1 to visualize the structure of ImageNet, and we show that the kernel's structure aligns with the WordNet semantic hierarchy. This establishes the loss kernel as a practical tool for interpretability and data attribution.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Sep 2025.
Builds on
20 of 46 references.
References · 20
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
- 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,346
- 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,231
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
- 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,841
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,714
- 2022Interpretability in the Wild: a Circuit for Indirect Object Identification in GPT-2 smallcited by 1,130
- 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 928
- 2022Grokking: Generalization Beyond Overfitting on Small Algorithmic Datasetscited by 599
- 2021BERT Busters: Outlier Dimensions that Disrupt Transformerscited by 110
- 2023The Local Learning Coefficient: A Singularity-Aware Complexity Measurecited by 50
- 2017Covariances, Robustness, and Variational Bayescited by 39
8 more
- 2024Differentiation and Specialization of Attention Heads via the Refined Local Learning Coefficientcited by 39
- 2023Dynamical versus Bayesian Phase Transitions in a Toy Model of Superpositioncited by 28
- 2025You Are What You Eat -- AI Alignment Requires Understanding How Data Shapes Structure and Generalisationcited by 15
- 2025Dynamics of Transient Structure in In-Context Linear Regression Transformerscited by 12
- 2025Training Data Attribution (TDA): Examining Its Adoption & Use Casescited by 4
- 2025Structure Development in List-Sorting Transformerscited by 4
- 2023W-Kernel and Its Principal Space for Frequentist Evaluation of Bayesian Estimatorscited by 3
- 2025Programs as Singularitiescited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 6.
8 papers.
- 2025Influence Dynamics and Stagewise Data Attributioncited by 5
- 2025Feature Identification via the Empirical NTKcited by 4
- 2026Towards Worst-Case Guarantees with Scale-Aware Interpretabilitycited by 3
- 2026From Density Matrices to Phase Transitions in Deep Learning: Spectral Early Warnings and Interpretabilitycited by 3
- 2026Mechanistic Anomaly Detection via Functional Attributioncited by 1
- 2026Susceptibilities and Patterning: A Primer on Linear Response in Bayesian Learningcited by 1
- 2026Differentiable Kernel Ridge Regression for Deep Learning Pipelinescited by 0
- 2026Patterning in Practice: Debiasing Reward Models with Susceptibilitiescited by 0
- 2026Patterning in Practice: Debiasing Reward Models with Susceptibilities1 Sep 2026
- 2026Susceptibilities and Patterning: A Primer on Linear Response in Bayesian Learning8 May 2026
- 2026Differentiable Kernel Ridge Regression for Deep Learning Pipelines4 May 2026
- 2026Mechanistic Anomaly Detection via Functional Attribution21 Apr 2026
- 2026From Density Matrices to Phase Transitions in Deep Learning: Spectral Early Warnings and Interpretability31 Mar 2026
- 2026Towards Worst-Case Guarantees with Scale-Aware Interpretability5 Feb 2026
- 2025Influence Dynamics and Stagewise Data Attribution14 Oct 2025
- 2025Feature Identification via the Empirical NTK1 Oct 2025