mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Training Data Attribution (TDA): Examining Its Adoption & Use Cases

arXiv 2501.12642 ↗First posted 22 Jan 2025cs.CYcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This report investigates Training Data Attribution (TDA) and its potential importance to and tractability for reducing extreme risks from AI. First, we discuss the plausibility and amount of effort it would take to bring existing TDA research efforts from their current state, to an efficient and accurate tool for TDA inference that can be run on frontier-scale LLMs. Next, we discuss the numerous research benefits AI labs will expect to see from using such TDA tooling. Then, we discuss a key outstanding bottleneck that would limit such TDA tooling from being accessible publicly: AI labs' willingness to disclose their training data. We suggest ways AI labs may work around these limitations, and discuss the willingness of governments to mandate such access. Assuming that AI labs willingly provide access to TDA inference, we then discuss what high-level societal benefits you might see. We list and discuss a series of policies and systems that may be enabled by TDA. Finally, we present an evaluation of TDA's potential impact on mitigating large-scale risks from AI systems.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 22 Jan 2025.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4.

4 papers.