Feature Identification via the Empirical NTK
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We provide evidence that eigenanalysis of the empirical neural tangent kernel (eNTK) can surface feature directions in trained neural networks. Across three increasingly realistic settings -- a 1-layer MLP trained on modular addition, a 1-layer Transformer trained on modular addition and the pretrained language model Gemma-3-270M -- we show that top eigenspaces of the eNTK align with ground-truth or interpretable features. In the modular arithmetic examples, top eNTK eigenspaces align with the Fourier features used by the MLP and the Fourier features at seed-dependent frequencies used by the Transformer to implement known ground-truth algorithms. Moreover, the alignment of the relevant subspaces evolves over training, with its first derivative peaking near the onset of grokking. For Gemma-3-270M, we compute top eNTK eigendirections on a dataset of TinyStories context windows and check their alignment with an automatically-generated set of parts-of-speech and other grammatical feature directions. We find that the alignment of eNTK eigendirections with grammar features outperforms a same-budget baseline of PCA on model activations. These results suggest that eNTK eigenanalysis may provide a new handle towards identifying features in trained models for mechanistic interpretability.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2025.
Builds on
29 of 50 references.
References · 29
- 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,621
- 2025Gemma 3 Technical Reportcited by 1,824
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,741
- 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,420
- 2016Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probescited by 1,353
- 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 971
- 2022In-context Learning and Induction Headscited by 964
- 2015Automatic differentiation in machine learning: a surveycited by 855
- 2023Progress measures for grokking via mechanistic interpretabilitycited by 839
- 2020Stanza: A Python Natural Language Processing Toolkit for Many Human Languagescited by 723
- 2022Grokking: Generalization Beyond Overfitting on Small Algorithmic Datasetscited by 629
- 2023TinyStories: How Small Can Language Models Be and Still Speak Coherent English?cited by 449
17 more
- 2022Emergent World Representations: Exploring a Sequence Model Trained on a Synthetic Taskcited by 431
- 2023Studying Large Language Model Generalization with Influence Functionscited by 326
- 2020Deep learning versus kernel learning: an empirical study of loss landscape geometry and the time evolution of the Neural Tangent Kernelcited by 187
- 2025Open Problems in Mechanistic Interpretabilitycited by 179
- 2021The Principles of Deep Learning Theorycited by 173
- 2021Neural Networks as Kernel Learners: The Silent Alignment Effectcited by 106
- 2025Sparse Autoencoders Trained on the Same Data Learn Different Featurescited by 93
- 2025Sparse Autoencoders Do Not Find Canonical Units of Analysiscited by 88
- 2023Grokking modular arithmeticcited by 83
- 2021What can linearized neural networks actually say about generalization?cited by 49
- 2024Decomposing The Dark Matter of Sparse Autoencoderscited by 45
- 2022A Fast, Well-Founded Approximation to the Empirical Neural Tangent Kernelcited by 30
- 2022What Can the Neural Tangent Kernel Tell Us About Adversarial Robustness?cited by 21
- 2022Evolution of Neural Tangent Kernels under Benign and Adversarial Trainingcited by 14
- 2024Using Degeneracy in the Loss Landscape for Mechanistic Interpretabilitycited by 13
- 2025The Loss Kernel: A Geometric Probe for Deep Learning Interpretabilitycited by 9
- 2024The Local Interaction Basis: Identifying Computationally-Relevant and Sparsely Interacting Features in Neural Networkscited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026Towards Worst-Case Guarantees with Scale-Aware Interpretabilitycited by 3
- 2026Mechanistically Eliciting Latent Behaviors in Language Modelscited by 3
- 2026Efficient Analysis of the Distilled Neural Tangent Kernelcited by 1
- 2026A Spectral Theory of Grokking: Weight Decay induces Feature Learningcited by 0
- 2026A Spectral Theory of Grokking: Weight Decay induces Feature Learning22 Sep 2026
- 2026Mechanistically Eliciting Latent Behaviors in Language Models28 Jun 2026
- 2026Efficient Analysis of the Distilled Neural Tangent Kernel11 Feb 2026
- 2026Towards Worst-Case Guarantees with Scale-Aware Interpretability5 Feb 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Fast Generalized Neural Tangent Kernel Statistics via Trace Estimation
- 2025Spectral Insights into Data-Oblivious Critical Layers in Large Language Models
- 2026Evidence for feature-specific error correction in LLMs
- 2024Investigating Sensitive Directions in GPT-2: An Improved Baseline and Comparative Analysis of SAEs
- 2026Revisiting Anisotropy in Language Transformers: The Geometry of Learning Dynamics
- 2026How Pruning Reshapes Features: Sparse Autoencoder Analysis of Weight-Pruned Language Models
- 2026Feature Geometry of LoRA Adapters: A Sparse Autoencoder Analysis of Representational Divergence in Fine-Tuned Language Models
- 2025Tracing the Representation Geometry of Language Models from Pretraining to Post-training