LLM Agents for Knowledge Discovery in Atomic Layer Processing
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Medical and scientific domain agents
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Models (LLMs) have garnered significant attention for several years now. Recently, their use as independently reasoning agents has been proposed. In this work, we test the potential of such agents for knowledge discovery in materials science. We repurpose LangGraph's tool functionality to supply agents with a black box function to interrogate. In contrast to process optimization or performing specific, user-defined tasks, knowledge discovery consists of freely exploring the system, posing and verifying statements about the behavior of this black box, with the sole objective of generating and verifying generalizable statements. We provide proof of concept for this approach through a children's parlor game, demonstrating the role of trial-and-error and persistence in knowledge discovery, and the strong path-dependence of results. We then apply the same strategy to show that LLM agents can explore, discover, and exploit diverse chemical interactions in an advanced Atomic Layer Processing reactor simulation using intentionally limited probe capabilities without explicit instructions.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Medical and scientific domain agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 8 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Sep 2025.
Builds on
8 of 57 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 7
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
- 2023ChemCrow: Augmenting large-language models with chemistry toolscited by 609
- 2025Measuring Scientific Capabilities of Language Models with a Systems Biology Dry Labcited by 11
- 2024Benchmarking large language models for materials synthesis: the case of atomic layer depositioncited by 8
- 2022Machine learning and atomic layer deposition: predicting saturation times from reactor growth profiles using artificial neural networkscited by 2
- 2024Validation of the Scientific Literature via Chemputation Augmented by Large Language Modelscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026From Knowledge to Action: Outcomes of the 2025 Large Language Model (LLM) Hackathon for Applications in Materials Science and Chemistry
- 2025Hierarchical Multi-agent Large Language Model Reasoning for Autonomous Functional Materials Discovery
- 2025Hypothesis Generation for Materials Discovery and Design Using Goal-Driven and Constraint-Guided LLM Agents
- 2025Large language models in materials science and the need for open-source approaches
- 2026Evaluating LLM-based AI agents integrated with materials synthesis tools: the case of atomic layer deposition
- 2026GraphAgents: Knowledge Graph-Guided Agentic AI for Cross-Domain Materials Design
- 2026Towards Agentic Intelligence for Materials Science
- 2024Are LLMs Ready for Real-World Materials Discovery?