mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Evaluating LLM-based AI agents integrated with materials synthesis tools: the case of atomic layer deposition

arXiv 2608.29309 ↗First posted 29 Aug 2026cond-mat.mtrl-sci cs.AI physics.app-phcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Medical and scientific domain agents

Abstract (arXiv)

This work provides an overview of the different strategies that can be used to evaluate the performance of AI models and agents based on large language models (LLMs) for materials synthesis. After providing a brief overview of the key technologies behind the current generation of AI agents based on LLMs, we summarize the different approaches to evaluating these models in the context of materials science and in particular on materials synthesis, with a specific emphasis on scenarios in which the models are directly integrated with experimental tools. We discuss evaluation strategies spanning knowledge and reasoning benchmarks, tool-use benchmarks, and closed loop benchmarks involving the interaction with experimental systems or realistic virtual tools. We use atomic layer deposition (ALD) as a case study, emphasizing how existing approaches in the literature both build from general approaches used beyond materials science and can be generalized to other materials synthesis techniques. Finally, we provide a practical evaluation framework to evaluate LLMs in the context of materials synthesis

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Medical and scientific domain agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 15 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Aug 2026.

Builds on

15 of 37 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026Performance of AI agents based on reasoning language models on ALD process optimization tasks15 Jan

Other references · 14

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  3. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
  4. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
  5. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,708
  6. 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,182
  7. 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,879
  8. 2023Gorilla: Large Language Model Connected with Massive APIscited by 1,332
  9. 2023A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Modelscited by 1,242
  10. 2023On the Tool Manipulation Capability of Open-source Large Language Modelscited by 122
  11. 2024Are large language models superhuman chemists?cited by 34
  12. 2024Probing the limitations of multimodal language models for chemistry and materials researchcited by 32
2 more
  1. 2025MatSciBench: Benchmarking the Reasoning Ability of Large Language Models in Materials Sciencecited by 15
  2. 2024Benchmarking large language models for materials synthesis: the case of atomic layer depositioncited by 8

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Large language models in materials science and the need for open-source approaches
  2. 2025Hypothesis Generation for Materials Discovery and Design Using Goal-Driven and Constraint-Guided LLM Agents
  3. 2024HoneyComb: A Flexible LLM-Based Agent System for Materials Science
  4. 2025LLM Agents for Knowledge Discovery in Atomic Layer Processing
  5. 2024LLMatDesign: Autonomous Materials Discovery with Large Language Models
  6. 2025A Survey of AI for Materials Science: Foundation Models, LLM Agents, Datasets, and Tools
  7. 2026Towards Agentic Intelligence for Materials Science
  8. 2025AtomWorld: A Benchmark for Evaluating Spatial Reasoning in Large Language Models on Crystalline Materials