Limited Preference Data? Learning Better Reward Model with Latent Space Synthesis
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Reward modeling and RLHF
Abstract (arXiv)
Reward modeling, crucial for aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences, is often bottlenecked by the high cost of preference data. Existing textual data synthesis methods are computationally expensive. We propose a novel framework LENS for synthesizing preference data directly in the LLM's latent embedding space. Our method employs a Variational Autoencoder (VAE) to learn a structured latent representation of response embeddings. By performing controlled perturbations in this latent space and decoding back to the embedding space, we efficiently generate diverse, semantically consistent synthetic preference pairs, bypassing costly text generation and annotation. We provide theoretical guarantees that our synthesized pairs approximately preserve original preference ordering and improve reward model generalization. Empirically, our latent-space synthesis significantly outperforms text-based augmentation on standard benchmarks, achieving superior results while being 18x faster in generation and using a 16,000x smaller model. Our work offers a scalable and effective alternative for enhancing reward modeling through efficient data augmentation. Code is publicly available at https://github.com/deeplearning-wisc/lens
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reward modeling and RLHF, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 48 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Sep 2025.
Builds on
48 of 58 references.
Closest ancestors · 16
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Rethinking Diverse Human Preference Learning through Principal Component Analysis18 Feb
- 2025PILAF: Optimal Human Preference Sampling for Reward Modeling6 Feb
- 2025Reviving The Classics: Active Reward Modeling in Large Language Model Alignment4 Feb
- 2024Self-Evolved Reward Learning for LLMs1 Nov
- 2024Skywork-Reward: Bag of Tricks for Reward Modeling in LLMs24 Oct
- 2024Rethinking Reward Model Evaluation: Are We Barking up the Wrong Tree?8 Oct
- 2024Scalable Ensembling For Mitigating Reward Overoptimisation3 Jun
- 2024Q-Probe: A Lightweight Approach to Reward Maximization for Language Models22 Feb
- 2024Self-Rewarding Language Models18 Jan
- 2023RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI Feedback1 Sep
- 2023RRHF: Rank Responses to Align Language Models with Human Feedback without tears11 Apr
- 2022Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimization19 Oct
4 more
Other references · 32
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 21,076
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
- 2018A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 6,013
- 2022Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,627
- 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,942
- 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,588
- 2024Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Sizecited by 1,998
- 2023ChatGPT Outperforms Crowd-Workers for Text-Annotation Taskscited by 870
20 more
- 2023AlpacaFarm: A Simulation Framework for Methods that Learn from Human Feedbackcited by 748
- 2015Generating Sentences from a Continuous Spacecited by 612
- 2017Deep Learning Scaling is Predictable, Empiricallycited by 582
- 2022Improving alignment of dialogue agents via targeted human judgementscited by 531
- 2016SeqGAN: Sequence Generative Adversarial Nets with Policy Gradientcited by 376
- 2022VOS: Learning What You Don't Know by Virtual Outlier Synthesiscited by 300
- 2022Is GPT-3 a Good Data Annotator?cited by 208
- 2023Generative Judge for Evaluating Alignmentcited by 169
- 2022Offline RL for Natural Language Generation with Implicit Language Q Learningcited by 138
- 2023Non-Parametric Outlier Synthesiscited by 129
- 2024Process Reward Model with Q-Value Rankingscited by 80
- 2020ScrabbleGAN: Semi-Supervised Varying Length Handwritten Text Generationcited by 69
- 2024Active Preference Learning for Large Language Modelscited by 58
- 2019Pretraining-Based Natural Language Generation for Text Summarizationcited by 40
- 2023Query-Dependent Prompt Evaluation and Optimization with Offline Inverse RLcited by 37
- 2019Controlling Text Complexity in Neural Machine Translationcited by 32
- 2024Prompt Perturbation Consistency Learning for Robust Language Modelscited by 26
- 2024Your Weak LLM is Secretly a Strong Teacher for Alignmentcited by 20
- 2025IPO: Your Language Model is Secretly a Preference Classifiercited by 17
- 2024Challenges and Future Directions of Data-Centric AI Alignmentcited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025SparseRM: A Lightweight Preference Modeling with Sparse Autoencoder
- 2024Beyond Bradley-Terry Models: A General Preference Model for Language Model Alignment
- 2026VRM: Teaching Reward Models to Understand Authentic Human Preferences
- 2025Latent Preference Coding: Aligning Large Language Models via Discrete Latent Codes
- 2024Reward-Augmented Data Enhances Direct Preference Alignment of LLMs
- 2024Boosting Reward Model with Preference-Conditional Multi-Aspect Synthetic Data Generation
- 2025PIRA: Preference-Oriented Instruction-Tuned Reward Models with Dual Aggregation
- 2025Debiasing Reward Models by Representation Learning with Guarantees