mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

PerQ: Efficient Evaluation of Multilingual Text Personalization Quality

arXiv 2509.25903 ↗First posted 30 Sep 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Since no metrics are available to evaluate specific aspects of a text, such as its personalization quality, the researchers often rely solely on large language models to meta-evaluate such texts. Due to internal biases of individual language models, it is recommended to use multiple of them for combined evaluation, which directly increases costs of such meta-evaluation. In this paper, a computationally efficient method for evaluation of personalization quality of a given text (generated by a language model) is introduced, called PerQ. A case study of comparison of generation capabilities of large and small language models shows the usability of the proposed metric in research, effectively reducing the waste of resources.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 11 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Sep 2025.

Builds on

7 of 11 references.

References · 7

  1. 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,944
  2. 2023LaMP: When Large Language Models Meet Personalizationcited by 437
  3. 2025ExPerT: Effective and Explainable Evaluation of Personalized Long-Form Text Generationcited by 26
  4. 2024Evaluation of LLM Vulnerabilities to Being Misused for Personalized Disinformation Generationcited by 20
  5. 2024METAL: Towards Multilingual Meta-Evaluationcited by 15
  6. 2025Exploring the Multilingual NLG Evaluation Abilities of LLM-Based Evaluatorscited by 5
  7. 2025PREF: Reference-Free Evaluation of Personalised Text Generation in LLMscited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.