PREF: Reference-Free Evaluation of Personalised Text Generation in LLMs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Personalised text generation is essential for user-centric information systems, yet most evaluation methods overlook the individuality of users. We introduce PREF, a Personalised Reference-free Evaluation Framework that jointly measures general output quality and user-specific alignment without requiring gold personalised references. PREF operates in a three-step pipeline: (1) a coverage stage uses a large language model (LLM) to generate a comprehensive, query-specific guideline covering universal criteria such as factuality, coherence, and completeness; (2) a preference stage re-ranks and selectively augments these factors using the target user's profile, stated or inferred preferences, and context, producing a personalised evaluation rubric; and (3) a scoring stage applies an LLM judge to rate candidate answers against this rubric, ensuring baseline adequacy while capturing subjective priorities. This separation of coverage from preference improves robustness, transparency, and reusability, and allows smaller models to approximate the personalised quality of larger ones. Experiments on the PrefEval benchmark, including implicit preference-following tasks, show that PREF achieves higher accuracy, better calibration, and closer alignment with human judgments than strong baselines. By enabling scalable, interpretable, and user-aligned evaluation, PREF lays the groundwork for more reliable assessment and development of personalised language generation systems.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Aug 2025.
Builds on
13 of 29 references.
References · 13
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
- 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,915
- 2019Plug and Play Language Models: A Simple Approach to Controlled Text Generationcited by 799
- 2016A Persona-Based Neural Conversation Modelcited by 223
- 2025Know Me, Respond to Me: Benchmarking LLMs for Dynamic User Profiling and Personalized Responses at Scalecited by 178
- 2025Do LLMs Recognize Your Preferences? Evaluating Personalized Preference Following in LLMscited by 148
- 2024Personalized Language Modeling from Personalized Human Feedbackcited by 132
- 2024Personalization of Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 104
- 2024LongLaMP: A Benchmark for Personalized Long-form Text Generationcited by 97
- 2025PersonaLens: A Benchmark for Personalization Evaluation in Conversational AI Assistantscited by 48
- 2023Learning Personalized Alignment for Evaluating Open-ended Text Generationcited by 29
- 2024Transparent and Scrutable Recommendations Using Natural Language User Profilescited by 24
1 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 4.
5 papers.
- 2026Toward Personalized LLM-Powered Agents: Foundations, Evaluation, and Future Directionscited by 14
- 2026Preference-Aware Rubric Learning for Personalized Evaluationcited by 2
- 2025PerQ: Efficient Evaluation of Multilingual Text Personalization Qualitycited by 0
- 2026Evaluation of Multilingual LLMs Personalized Text Generation Capabilities Targeting Groups and Social-Media Platformscited by 0
- 2026From Feelings to Metrics: Understanding and Formalizing How Users Vibe-Test LLMscited by 0
- 2026Preference-Aware Rubric Learning for Personalized Evaluation29 May 2026
- 2026From Feelings to Metrics: Understanding and Formalizing How Users Vibe-Test LLMs15 Apr 2026
- 2026Toward Personalized LLM-Powered Agents: Foundations, Evaluation, and Future Directions26 Feb 2026
- 2026Evaluation of Multilingual LLMs Personalized Text Generation Capabilities Targeting Groups and Social-Media Platforms7 Jan 2026
- 2025PerQ: Efficient Evaluation of Multilingual Text Personalization Quality30 Sep 2025